Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Being the antenna is elevated, I wouldn't expect 8 ft
radials to work worth a hoot, except for 10m. They need to be resonant. The "same height as radiator, for usable performance" doesn't really apply to elevated radials, that need to be resonant. Only ground mount, will that work ok. Yes, a hat will always help, but I would just string it with cheap wire, if it's hidden away in an attic. If on a roof, you could hang sloping top loading wires, that sloped towards some tie off point. Or you could use a fancier hat setup....More $$$ though. ![]() use loaded radials...Or maybe a 2nd loaded element to complete the antenna as a psuedo loaded dipole. ?? MK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gud morning Mark Keith, You guys could make my life considerably less
complicated if you would just come up with an FM antenna design for my screwdriver,...FM, that is Flippin Magic. Thats all I'm asking for here, magic! Kidding aside here, I think on the roof is out the question now. My favorite wife just won't go with radials all over the roof. I don't understand the "sloping top loading wires, that sloped towards some tie point". You have a picture of something like this? It would sure help me out trying to visualize this thing. You are trying to educate a slow learning hombre down here,..pics go a long way. :-[ I can't tell you how much I appreciate you helping me out with this little project. You have a good day and God bless. Butch Magee KF5DE wrote: Being the antenna is elevated, I wouldn't expect 8 ft radials to work worth a hoot, except for 10m. They need to be resonant. The "same height as radiator, for usable performance" doesn't really apply to elevated radials, that need to be resonant. Only ground mount, will that work ok. Yes, a hat will always help, but I would just string it with cheap wire, if it's hidden away in an attic. If on a roof, you could hang sloping top loading wires, that sloped towards some tie off point. Or you could use a fancier hat setup....More $$$ though. ![]() use loaded radials...Or maybe a 2nd loaded element to complete the antenna as a psuedo loaded dipole. ?? MK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't understand the "sloping top loading wires, that sloped towards
some tie point". You have a picture of something like this?....... Just visualize a upside down ground plane, with the radials on top, instead of the bottom. That's about what it would look like. They could slope a bit, and I don't think it would hurt too much. I think it will be more effective as a hat, if you can connect the ends of the wires to make a outer loop. But you don't have to do that. If you had it in the attic, and the roof/ rafters were all wood, with no metal, you could have the tip of the antenna near the roof/rafters, and just run the hat wires along the rafters. But ya still have to worry about those ground radials.... ![]() It might be easier to make some kind of attic dipole, or loaded dipole, using two elements back to back. That type antenna requires no radials. I have two attic antennas myself...One is a 2 m ground plane, hung from the rafters, and the other is a 40m dipole, that is fed with 300 ohm line to my tuner. It will work 40-10 ok...It's kinda of a backup I can use if the lightning is so bad in the area, that I don't want my regular outside antennas connected. I even unhook it, if it gets real close. MK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ground radials -- the practicalities? | Antenna | |||
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
Having trouble laying your radials? | Policy | |||
Performance of a system of Ground Radials | Antenna | |||
ground radials? | Antenna |