RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   A Quantum Antenna? (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/69951-quantum-antenna.html)

Asimov April 28th 05 04:32 PM

A Quantum Antenna?
 
Hi,

I am thinking out loud about how the semiconductor LED evolved into
the laser diode, by exploiting the synchronized population increase
mechanism to generate monochromatic photon emission. Might it be
possible to scale down this electron mechanism to usable radio
frequencies and end up with a radio transmitting antenna that doesn't
require aerials? Might this device then be termed a radio diode?

A*s*i*m*o*v

.... Anyone not wearing 2,000,000 sunblock is gonna have a REAL_ BAD_ DAY_7


John Smith April 28th 05 07:30 PM

Uh, the wavelenght of light aproaches or is about equiv to the diameter of
an atom... a "Radio Emitting Diode" (RED? as opposed to a LED) would be BIG
to emit frequency on the 160 meter band!

Regards,
John



Roy Lewallen April 28th 05 07:54 PM

"Scale up" is probably a more descriptive term than "scale down". Do you
know how big it would have to be?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Asimov wrote:
Hi,

I am thinking out loud about how the semiconductor LED evolved into
the laser diode, by exploiting the synchronized population increase
mechanism to generate monochromatic photon emission. Might it be
possible to scale down this electron mechanism to usable radio
frequencies and end up with a radio transmitting antenna that doesn't
require aerials? Might this device then be termed a radio diode?

A*s*i*m*o*v

... Anyone not wearing 2,000,000 sunblock is gonna have a REAL_ BAD_ DAY_7


Peter Hayes April 28th 05 10:06 PM

Asimov wrote:

Hi,

I am thinking out loud about how the semiconductor LED evolved into
the laser diode, by exploiting the synchronized population increase
mechanism to generate monochromatic photon emission. Might it be
possible to scale down this electron mechanism to usable radio
frequencies and end up with a radio transmitting antenna that doesn't
require aerials? Might this device then be termed a radio diode?


LEDs don't emit coherent radiation. All your jumbo "RED" would do would
be to emit wideband noise.

--

Peter

John Smith April 28th 05 10:33 PM

They don't? Then hell--I am throwing this laser led away!!!

John



Joel Kolstad April 28th 05 11:24 PM

"Peter Hayes" wrote in message
o.uk...
LEDs don't emit coherent radiation. All your jumbo "RED" would do would
be to emit wideband noise.


It's not THAT wide, is it? Anyone know the Q of an LED? I'd guess it's at
least 10...



John Smith April 29th 05 01:52 AM

Actually, a "RED" in ultra-high Ghz is NOT a bad idea--I bet that is on
someones design system!
It actually would not surprize me if the military wasn't already planning a
weapon on such a device--and this is why we have not heard about it... of
course--I may have just forgotten my medication and it is those damn
delusions again! grin

Regards,
John



Richard Clark April 29th 05 02:08 AM

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:52:49 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:
Actually, a "RED" in ultra-high Ghz is NOT a bad idea--I bet that is on
someones design system!

They used to call it a MASER. If it had been such a good idea, it
would still be a good idea.

John Smith April 29th 05 02:19 AM

Richard:

Don't spoil the fun! sad-face

Warmest regards,
John



Richard Harrison April 29th 05 03:58 AM

John Smith wrote:
"Don`t spoil the fun! sad-face"

According to my online encyclopedia, the Maser is not new. It appeared
in the Soviet Union about 1952 and was quickly adopted in the U.S.A..

Early Masers got stimulated emission in a stream of energized ammonia
molecules at 24 gigahertz.

Nobel prizes in physics were awarded in 1964 for Maser developments.

The last 40 years has seen emphasis shift to Optical Masers (Lasers).
These now have many applications from surgery to chart pointers. They
are also used to cut metal.

Not quite as many varieties as Baskin & Robbins yet, but the game is
new. Lasers come in many colors and power levels. Wavelengths are in
hundreds of nanometers. 193 nm is UV and comes from argon flouride.
10,600 nm is FIR from Carbon Dioxide. This is the metal cutter.

Find the right material and discover how to tune it to the frequency of
your choice. You may have a new HF generator. You may not have obviated
wave guides and antennas appropriate to the frequency.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


John Smith April 29th 05 05:41 AM

I have a high-power LED flashlight, 5 superbright leds in the element... it
is bright, if I bring it near an AM radios I lose all reception... this rfi
is solely the product of the leds, the connecting wires and the
batteries--the flashlight housing is aluminum...
I have never checked just how large a bandwidth the rfi covers...

Regards,
John



John Smith April 29th 05 05:48 AM

Yes, I would think there are MASERs in operation somewhere... they are
interesting devices--I don't think we have heard the last of them, by a long
shot...
The information you posted is interesting, I was not aware it was a Russian
discovery, or discovered in the year I was born!
Thanks for that bit of history...

Regards,
John



Roy Lewallen April 29th 05 06:39 AM

Your flashlight likely has a DC-DC converter in it to keep the light
output relatively constant as the battery voltage drops. That would be
the source of the RFI. It's also possible that the LEDs are multiplexed
so that one won't hog all the current as they would if parallel
connected. That also could create considerable RFI. Although the RFI is
radiating from the components you mention, they aren't its source.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

John Smith wrote:
I have a high-power LED flashlight, 5 superbright leds in the element... it
is bright, if I bring it near an AM radios I lose all reception... this rfi
is solely the product of the leds, the connecting wires and the
batteries--the flashlight housing is aluminum...
I have never checked just how large a bandwidth the rfi covers...

Regards,
John



Richard Clark April 29th 05 06:42 AM

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:58:41 -0500, (Richard
Harrison) wrote:

The last 40 years has seen emphasis shift to Optical Masers (Lasers).
These now have many applications from surgery to chart pointers. They
are also used to cut metal.


Hi All,

When I was a kid, I had an issue of Mad Magazine that published a
commemorative piece on notable unknown inventors, one of whom was
George Foont, the inventor of the Lazier Beam. The picture showed the
proud inventor with his invention whose beam of radiation shot out a
foot or two, and then drooped to illuminate the floor in front of him.

I also recall another, more sophisticated entry from the New Yorker.
It was with an inventor and his patent lawyer standing at the street
window of the lawyer's hi-rise office. The lawyer was holding the
beam projector aimed out the window, but a look of disgust was evident
in his expression:
"Death Ray!? It doesn't even slow them down!"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Harrison April 29th 05 07:06 AM

John Smith wrote:
"I have a high power LED flashlight. 5 superbright LED`s in the
element...it is bright. If I bring it near an AM radio, I lose all
reception."

I have a Timex Indeglow watch with a fairly dim dial illumination when I
depress the dialstem. It wipes out radio reception too. I suspect that
solidstate diodes are noidy devices. They are efficient though as the
light is not accompanied with much heat. As for diode noise, zeners are
often used as noise generators, are they not?

There are various ways to get an atom`s orbital electrons to move to a
higher energy level. You can throw a stick on a fire or aim an electron
beam on a CRT phospher.. From a laser, we`re looking for coherent
radiation.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


John Smith April 29th 05 07:11 AM

Well, you might be right at that (and contrary to how you took my posts--I
DO recognize you as an authority which has been around the block many more
times than I), however, I have had that flashlight apart a half-dozen times,
at least, it cannot be found!

But, it is quite possible the current limiter is right on the chip with the
LEDS and potted with it in the LED lenses... all five LEDS run in
parallel....


Warmest regards,
John



John Smith April 29th 05 08:01 AM

I remember that "death ray" one!!!! I darn near died laughing when I seen
that--back then--and darn near died laughing again--just now--your reminding
me of it!!!
But then, I have a quirk, I am probably the only one... I have a VERY LOW
respect for lawyers... grin

Warmest regards,
John



John Smith April 29th 05 08:37 AM

There are various ways to get an atom`s orbital electrons to move to a
higher energy level...

Your sentence, above, triggered some questions I have had in the back of my
mind...
In older lasers, they were referred to as "pumps", and indeed the light
souce always seemed to be "strobed."
I wonder if a LED is not "strobed", either occuring as a natural property of
the LED itself, or circuitry incorporated on the LED chip, itself, which
"strobes" it?
Mainly, I have considered the above in regards to wondering about giant
sheets of polished aluminum, focusing the sun on a laser rod (or gas tube)
and beaming the energy down to the planet (as has been proposed by others),
and if someway to "strobe" the lightsouce would have to be devised? And,
this in regards to the "pump"-ing action I have heard referenced... as, if I
understand it correctly, you must kick (pump) the electrons up a level, then
let them oscillate back to their original state, then kick-pump them
again... as the actual light is generated by the electrons shifting states,
and NOT just the fact that they are at another energy level...
It seemed to me the answer would be easy to find, from a search of the
web... I was not successful...
Your thoughts/knowledge?

Regards,
John



Roy Lewallen April 29th 05 10:43 AM

Now, that got my attention. I haven't kept up well with LED technology,
but I haven't heard of any LEDs that have a built-in regulator,
switching or otherwise. Out of curiosity, I tested the LED lights I have
with an AM radio, and found the following:

1. A three-LED headlamp with no obvious electronics, fixed intensity,
runs from 3 AAA cells: Quiet, no RFI.
2. Two different LED headlamps, one with 3 and the other 4 LEDs, with
several intensity settings, run from 3 AAA cells: Loud audio whine.
3. Two small UV LED lights, run from 3 button cells: Quiet, no RFI.
4. Newly purchased one-LED flashlight, runs from a single AA cell:
Generates an RF hiss.

This is about what I expected. The #2 headlamps switch the lights on and
off with varying duty cycle to get the different intensities. This can
be seen by rapidly moving the light while on. The switching isn't
visible at the maximum brightness setting but apparently the switcher is
still on. It might be doubling as a regulator. High intensity LEDs seem
to require about 4.5 volts for full brightness, and one cell is nowhere
near enough to light one up without a DC-DC converter. So the #4 light
has to have one. That explains its RFI. Built-in converters seem to be
getting more common; without one, batteries last an incredible length of
time, but at the expense of light intensity that falls dramatically as
the battery discharges, especially during the first part of the
discharge period.

So unless there's some sort of LED defect that can cause RF noise, my
money's still on your having some kind of converter or switch hidden in
your flashlight somewhere. All the lights I have which don't have either
are quiet.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

John Smith wrote:
Well, you might be right at that (and contrary to how you took my posts--I
DO recognize you as an authority which has been around the block many more
times than I), however, I have had that flashlight apart a half-dozen times,
at least, it cannot be found!

But, it is quite possible the current limiter is right on the chip with the
LEDS and potted with it in the LED lenses... all five LEDS run in
parallel....


Warmest regards,
John



Cecil Moore April 29th 05 01:03 PM

John Smith wrote:
I have a high-power LED flashlight, 5 superbright leds in the element... it
is bright, if I bring it near an AM radios I lose all reception... this rfi
is solely the product of the leds, the connecting wires and the
batteries--the flashlight housing is aluminum...
I have never checked just how large a bandwidth the rfi covers...


The LEDs may be pulsed by something resembling a square
wave duty cycle thus generating a host of harmonics.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Wes Stewart April 29th 05 03:42 PM

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 02:43:31 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote:


There is a letter on this very subject in the Pease Porridge column of
the latest issue of "Electronic Design."

Now, that got my attention. I haven't kept up well with LED technology,
but I haven't heard of any LEDs that have a built-in regulator,
switching or otherwise. Out of curiosity, I tested the LED lights I have
with an AM radio, and found the following:

1. A three-LED headlamp with no obvious electronics, fixed intensity,
runs from 3 AAA cells: Quiet, no RFI.
2. Two different LED headlamps, one with 3 and the other 4 LEDs, with
several intensity settings, run from 3 AAA cells: Loud audio whine.
3. Two small UV LED lights, run from 3 button cells: Quiet, no RFI.
4. Newly purchased one-LED flashlight, runs from a single AA cell:
Generates an RF hiss.

This is about what I expected. The #2 headlamps switch the lights on and
off with varying duty cycle to get the different intensities. This can
be seen by rapidly moving the light while on. The switching isn't
visible at the maximum brightness setting but apparently the switcher is
still on. It might be doubling as a regulator. High intensity LEDs seem
to require about 4.5 volts for full brightness, and one cell is nowhere
near enough to light one up without a DC-DC converter. So the #4 light
has to have one. That explains its RFI. Built-in converters seem to be
getting more common; without one, batteries last an incredible length of
time, but at the expense of light intensity that falls dramatically as
the battery discharges, especially during the first part of the
discharge period.

So unless there's some sort of LED defect that can cause RF noise, my
money's still on your having some kind of converter or switch hidden in
your flashlight somewhere. All the lights I have which don't have either
are quiet.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

John Smith wrote:
Well, you might be right at that (and contrary to how you took my posts--I
DO recognize you as an authority which has been around the block many more
times than I), however, I have had that flashlight apart a half-dozen times,
at least, it cannot be found!

But, it is quite possible the current limiter is right on the chip with the
LEDS and potted with it in the LED lenses... all five LEDS run in
parallel....


Warmest regards,
John




Richard Clark April 29th 05 04:03 PM

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 02:43:31 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote:

I haven't kept up well with LED technology,
but I haven't heard of any LEDs that have a built-in regulator,
switching or otherwise.


Hi Roy,

Constant current LEDs have been around since the late 70s. They were
marginally common then, but I rarely see them now.

As for the spectrum of LEDs, the all require different battery
voltages to bring them to full output. Light power is always
expressed as a function of current, not voltage however. The voltage
is somewhat likened to the forward conduction knee.

IR LEDs have the lowest knee voltage, roughly at the same potential as
common diodes: 0.6V. Blue LEDs have the highest knee voltage, roughly
3V to 3.5V. The colors Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Aquamarine, Blue,
UV exhibit the order of ascending voltage (and in the conventional
order of wavelength for a rainbow). The White LED is simply a Blue or
UV LED coated with phosphor (a solid state fluorescent light).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark April 29th 05 04:14 PM

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:37:12 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

I wonder if a LED is not "strobed", either occuring as a natural property of
the LED itself, or circuitry incorporated on the LED chip, itself, which
"strobes" it?


Hi Brett,

The voltage supplied to the LED elevates the electron out of one
orbital to the conduction band. When it falls back, a photon is
emitted. The wavelength of the emitted photon is the path length the
electron follows spiraling from one orbital to the other (DeBroglie
wave).

There are no lasers that are pumped in a cyclic sense except those
that emit a pulse like the old CO2 UV lasers. I had a buddy who built
one that used plate glass and aluminum foil to build the high voltage
charge used to excite the gas to lasing (you still need an optically
resonant chamber to build the intensity).

This design, from the pages of Scientific American's Amateur Scientist
column exhibited a very high peak power because of the extremely short
pulse duration. His knowing this instilled the caution to aim it out
the window into free space for its inaugural firing. When he pulsed
it he cracked the window. Window glass is not perfectly transmissive,
and the high peak power and short interval conspired to create a very
hot dislocality - the glass couldn't shed the heat fast enough and it
cracked.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

John Smith April 29th 05 05:05 PM

Phosphor? Wow, that fact had missed me totally...
The lifetime rating on those white LEDs are incredible!!!
From seeing crt tubes degrade over time, I'd expect there to be some sort of
problem with the phosphor over such a long lifetime? A crt fails/dims due
to air entering the tube, possibly?

regards,
john



Jim Kelley April 29th 05 08:47 PM



Richard Clark wrote:
The wavelength of the emitted photon is the path length the
electron follows spiraling from one orbital to the other (DeBroglie
wave).


Actually, I think it's more of a quantum thing - a function of the band
gap energy E, which is equal to hv (read h nu) where h is Planck's
constant. Wavelenth is of course related to v by a constant, c (speed
of light). Lambda = c/v. So wavelength = hc/E. If it was a DeBroglie
thing, wavelength would depend on the momentum of the particle as h/p.
The band gap energy is not determined by the energy carried by the
particle, (or by the length of its path), but by the atomic nature of
the material comprising the LED, and the difference in energy between
the conduction band and the valence band of that material.

ac6xg


John Smith April 29th 05 08:58 PM

Probably... and those of us who have taken calculus and spent years of our
life closely working with mathematicians (or, those truck drivers who had an
uncanny interest in math and have studied it in great detail--just for
self-satisfaction) grasp the general concept--however, a wise-intelligent
individual tries to express the complex in terms where the greatest numbers
can make use of the knowledge, especially, when debates/arguments and proofs
are offered in such a public forum as usenet--here, your explaination
fails... I would venture that to most--this looks like nothing more than you
stroking your ego...

Regards,
John



Richard Clark April 29th 05 09:42 PM

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:05:27 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

A crt fails/dims due
to air entering the tube, possibly?


Hi Brett,

I've seen air enter the tube - perhaps, but there are more
conventional explanations. Those episodes of "seeing" it enter were
slightly less than catastrophic (accidentally broke the final seal,
which, as it happens, is the right way to de-activate them).
Principally it is the oxidation of the cathode (one reason why tubes
have scavengers) from what air had remained from the production cycle.

Back when I did TV repair as a teen, and then later in the Navy as
part of a Christmas charity project, we used what was called a
"rejuvenator."

This piece of gear would apply several hundred to a thousand volts
between the cathode and the first grid (usually a cylindrical shield
capped with a plate with a pinhole in it) and hold the voltage there
for a couple of seconds (manufacturer's recommended time). This would
produce a current that would rip the surface of the cathode open
revealing a new emitting area and the tube would come to life for
another 6 months.

Well, during the extended project in the Navy, we found any number of
tubes that refused this Lazarus treatment. We simply held the button
down for 30-60 seconds as they sizzled. Who cared? It often
convinced the tube that there was more to life than consignment to the
dumpster (the guys loved to give them the heave-ho to thundering
explosion). The only downside to this aggressive treatment was that
in ripping open the surface, part of the current was a debris stream
towards the grid that would occlude the pin hole. Sort of self
defeating when you think about it (and good reason for the recommended
couple of seconds instead of our heavy thumb).

All rather remote possibilities for the White LED. LEDs suffer other
problems in commercial service. Usually with aging where the
half-life is quicker than expected. Another problem is with what is
called sun bleaching (usually the problem of LED traffic lights). I
would suspect either, or both, to be issues with vendors and poor QA
or selection. There are a world of "ultra-bright" specifications that
wander the map.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark April 29th 05 10:14 PM

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:47:18 -0700, Jim Kelley
wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
The wavelength of the emitted photon is the path length the
electron follows spiraling from one orbital to the other (DeBroglie
wave).


Actually, I think it's more of a quantum thing


Hi Jim,

The De Broglie [my spelling error] wave is a quantum thing.

In fact Louis de Brolie presented in 1924 that MATTER was composed of
discrete wavelengths (quanta). His was the identical treatment of
Einstein's proposition with light. Both he and Einstein had revealed
the duality of nature, and De Broglie's assertions were proven in
1927. The effect of his work left Schrodinger with the starting point
for his development of quantum mechanics.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

John Smith April 29th 05 10:30 PM

Damn...
That is all silly...
But, hey, does that light bulb in the refrig really go out when I close the
door? Or, is it too subject to the quantum laws, and it only depends on an
observer? grin

Regards,
John



Richard Clark April 29th 05 11:50 PM

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:30:01 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:
But, hey, does that light bulb in the refrig really go out when I close the
door? Or, is it too subject to the quantum laws

Only if Schrodinger's cat was inside to watch.

Jim - NN7K April 30th 05 01:34 AM

Richard is quite correct, tho to older hams, believe the
term he uses for "Scavengers", were called "GETTERS", and
were to claim any free gas's in a tube (this is anchient
history!). And, another method that was used , was an
"Extender", which was in reality, nothing more than a step-
up transformer for the filament, raiseing the voltage (and
hence the cathode temperature) by 1 to 2 tenths of a volt.
these were also (a variation of this principle) available
on telephone microwave carriers , where the klystrons cost
several hundreds of $$$ . These, normally set the voltage
at 6.3 volts, but you could (at your own risk) turn it as
high as 7 volts. But, normally didn't exceed 6.5 volts.
and to give an idea just how prudent, the receive local
oscillators is some of that equipment, (according to the
date codes), lasted in excess of 20 YEARS continious service!
It wasn't the phospors that deteriorated, but the free
electrons that the cathode could radiate!
And, as a side note, Southern Pacific, found an outfit that
would replace the filiment/cathode and rebuild those same
klystrons , at about 1/4 the price of the new ones- the
original equipment was made by Lenkurt , about 1960 vintage
and only , about 8 years ago was finally retired, replaced
with solid state, mostly digital, but some analog equipment!
If this hasn't boored you by now, dont know what it will take!

As info, Jim NN7K (really dates me) !

Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:05:27 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:


A crt fails/dims due
to air entering the tube, possibly?



Hi Brett,


Principally it is the oxidation of the cathode (one reason why tubes
have scavengers) from what air had remained from the production cycle.

Snip
Back when I did TV repair as a teen, and then later in the Navy as
part of a Christmas charity project, we used what was called a
"rejuvenator."

snip
This piece of gear would apply several hundred to a thousand volts
between the cathode and the first grid (usually a cylindrical shield
capped with a plate with a pinhole in it) and hold the voltage there
for a couple of seconds (manufacturer's recommended time). This would
produce a current that would rip the surface of the cathode open
revealing a new emitting area and the tube would come to life for
another 6 months.

snip again!
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


John Smith April 30th 05 02:12 AM

Ahhh, the cat... likely someone just forgot to put it out...

Warmest regards,
John



[email protected] May 1st 05 01:58 PM

Indiglo uses an electroluminescent panel that's powered by an inverter.
It takes something like 100V to light it. It's probably the inverter
that's causing the RFI.


Richard Harrison May 2nd 05 01:17 PM

Geneb wrote:
"Indiglo uses an electroluminescent panel that`s powered by an
inverter."

The whine says you`re right.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com