I define true "isotropic" as impossible... perhaps a sphere as an
antenna--in space...

I define "3db of loss" as the "minimum acceptable", not the desired...

Got anymore hairs to split, I got my "hair-splitter" out, no problem
really...

Regards,
John

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
| On Fri, 6 May 2005 10:09:00 -0700, "John Smith"
| wrote:
|
| Doesn't his original post "indicate" he wishes a "horizontal" polarized
ant,
| as opposed to vertical nose rod?
|
| What part of: "an isotropic radiator with 3db of loss would be fine"
| do you have a problem with?