Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ml wrote:
what i ponder is what if any improvements i might see over the dipole or if under what 'conditions' it might be better --if at all?? Here's some comparison radiation patterns on 40m for the horizontal and vertical antennas that I had up a year ago. The vertical suffered from 2 S-units higher (local) noise. http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/dipvsver.htm -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna | |||
Shortwave random-wire antenna question | Shortwave | |||
6m vert dipole | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna |