RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   HF Yagi With Elevation Rotor ?? (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/70814-hf-yagi-elevation-rotor.html)

Caveat Lector May 12th 05 04:11 PM

HF Yagi With Elevation Rotor ??
 
Had an experienced Ham claim that rotating an HF yagi in the elevation plane
would give significant signal gain on some signals.

Never heard of such a thing

Comments please

--
CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !








Dennis Kaylor May 12th 05 07:35 PM

why wouldnt it?
if you raise the directed end of the antenna you are changing the angle
of radiation so you would effect the performance of the antenna
also effective if you live on a mountain top and want to work the valley
if you didnt lower the antenna it would shot right over there heads
you aim the antennas Az direction with good effect so why wouldnt
elevating the antenna has similar effect?

Caveat Lector wrote:
Had an experienced Ham claim that rotating an HF yagi in the elevation plane
would give significant signal gain on some signals.

Never heard of such a thing

Comments please


Bob Bob May 12th 05 07:38 PM

The simple way to find out is to model it on Eznec/4nec2 etc...

In my mind a HF yagi will never be quite high enough and there will be
multiple lobes at differing takeoff angles. Changing the boom angle to
the horizontal will tend to change where these lobes point so one would
experience a change in gain to stations at specific distances. How much
difference I dont know because I dont have a handle on how critical the
refraction angle is through the ionosphere.

Cheers Bob VK2YQA



Caveat Lector wrote:
Had an experienced Ham claim that rotating an HF yagi in the elevation plane
would give significant signal gain on some signals.

Never heard of such a thing

Comments please


Cecil Moore May 12th 05 08:08 PM

Dennis Kaylor wrote:

also effective if you live on a mountain top and want to work the valley
if you didnt lower the antenna it would shot right over there heads
you aim the antennas Az direction with good effect so why wouldnt
elevating the antenna has similar effect?


I know a ham who raises and lowers his motorized tower
in order to vary his take-off-angle for maximum S-meter
reading on the receive end - low for domestic, high for
DX.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[email protected] May 12th 05 08:30 PM

Gee Cecil! I have just been convinced that there is nothing you can do to an
antenna to improve communication!
I am now content with the notion that propagation controls communication
and nothing you can do to an antenna to change that TOA ....Grin
Art


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Dennis Kaylor wrote:

also effective if you live on a mountain top and want to work the valley
if you didnt lower the antenna it would shot right over there heads
you aim the antennas Az direction with good effect so why wouldnt
elevating the antenna has similar effect?


I know a ham who raises and lowers his motorized tower
in order to vary his take-off-angle for maximum S-meter
reading on the receive end - low for domestic, high for
DX.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---




Cecil Moore May 12th 05 08:52 PM

wrote:
Gee Cecil! I have just been convinced that there is nothing you can do to an
antenna to improve communication!
I am now content with the notion that propagation controls communication
and nothing you can do to an antenna to change that TOA ....Grin


Just ran a 2-element 20m beam at a height of ten feet and
got a TOA of 55 degrees. Ran it at a height of 100 feet
and got a TOA of 10 degrees.
--
73, Cecil,
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[email protected] May 12th 05 09:58 PM

But all of the R.F fell down in the same place after
hitting the ionasphere Right?
Art
:)

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Gee Cecil! I have just been convinced that there is nothing you can do to
an
antenna to improve communication!
I am now content with the notion that propagation controls communication
and nothing you can do to an antenna to change that TOA ....Grin


Just ran a 2-element 20m beam at a height of ten feet and
got a TOA of 55 degrees. Ran it at a height of 100 feet
and got a TOA of 10 degrees.
--
73, Cecil,
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----




Roy Lewallen May 12th 05 10:05 PM

wrote:
Gee Cecil! I have just been convinced that there is nothing you can do to an
antenna to improve communication!
. . .


Then you obviously either didn't read or didn't understand all that was
recently posted on the topic. Hopefully some of the other folks reading
the newsgroup did, and benefitted from the discussion, even if you didn't.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com