Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary wrote:
I've read for years ( and never asked why ) that when you're operating into a high SWR that a high impedance feedline ( say 450 Ohm ladder line VS 52 Ohm coax ) provides much less loss. I think I recall someone in this group saying that its mostly current losses. Does the high impedance line have higher voltage points across its length and therefore less current flow for a give power level ( say 100 watts ) than the 52 Ohm coax ? The Z0 of a feedline forces the ratio of forward voltage to forward current to be Z0. It also forces the ratio of reflected voltage to reflected voltage to be Z0. Let's say we have 100 watts forward and 50 watts reflected on both 450 ohm feedline and 52 ohm coax. The forward voltage on the 450 ohm feedline is SQRT(100*450). The forward current on the 450 ohm feedline is SQRT(100/450). The forward voltage on the 52 ohm coax is SQRT(100*52). The forward current on the 52 ohm coax is SQRT(100/52). The same pattern holds for reflected signals. The effect of Z0 on voltage and current is easy to see. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
Variable stub | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
Conservation of Energy | Antenna |