Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
The number one reason for attenuation being higher is because the conductor diameter is smaller and, as a consequence, its resistance is higher. On that we can disagree. The *number one* reason for attenuation being higher is because, in a matched feedline, the losses are proportional to the square of the current, and the current is inversely proportional to the characteristic impedance of the feedline, i.e. given #20 wire, a Zo-matched 75 ohm feedline will have Sqrt(600/75) times the I^2*R losses of a matched 75 ohm feedline. Proof: SQRT(100w/75) = SQRT(600/75)*SQRT(100w/600) SQRT(100w/75)/SQRT(600/75) = SQRT(100w/600) 100w/600 = 100w/600 Given that the center conductor of RG-213 is the same size wire as a parallel feedline, a *very* large percentage of the difference in matched line dissipation is due to the Z0. (I don't know the size of the center wire in RG-213 but it looks like #14 or #12.) I don't think the RG-213 center conductor is at all smaller. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
Variable stub | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
Conservation of Energy | Antenna |