Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wes Stewart" wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:41:22 -0400, "Tam/WB2TT" wrote: [snip] CJ, I ran an EZNEC simulation on a pair of crossed dipoles at 3.7 and 4.5 MHz, with a 7.2 MHz inverted V below the 3.7. Not good. The 7.2 works OK, but the 4.5 really messes up the 3.7. Among other things the impedance at 3.7 and 4.5 MHz is about 115 Ohms. I ran the simulation at 50 feet above average ground. If the 4.5 is for receive only, I would forget about it, and take the 10:1 SWR that the 80 meter dipole gives you. I'd be interested to see your Eznec file. Gladly, but, how do I get an ASCII file out of it. I thought I had opened EZNEC files in Notepad, but it is garbage. Also, even from within EZNEC when I click on View File, I get the same garbage as Notepad. The only questionable thing I did would be the 0.2 foot stub in the middle that the other wires are connected to; but that works for other configurations. Tam/WB2TT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Antenna tuner is nessasry for TWO-TURN coax loop?? | Antenna | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |