Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand that patents do not always tell the whole story either:
many, many years ago I worked in a pharmaceutical laboratory where we were trying to come up with a product that circumvented a German patent, but we could not even get the process described in the patent to work -- they may have omitted mention of a catalyst. -=- Alan On 11/08/03 11:32 am Sverre Holm put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace: The antenna was first patented in Norway this summer, and I have just read that patent. I think the innovative aspect of it is the ferrite and its properties which makes it feasible for a transmitter at VHF/UHF at reasonable power levels and with a size of only a few cms. Of course, the patent says very little about the ferrite - I guess that's how a good patent is supposed to be written. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |