Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave:
The T-Match will still show a favor in signal launch because of the imbalance of the gamma rods on one side, on a beam this could even be manipulated to ones favor--not as likely on a monopole... just looking for a way to completely balance the field pattern... I just thought someone had most likely done something like this before... if I don't hear of anyone, will shove some various sized drain, stove pipe, soldered cans, etc. over a 1/2 monopole in place of the gamma rod and check it out this weekend... Warmest regards, John "Dave" wrote in message ... why not a T match. simpler to build and adjust than a gamma, completely dc grounded, and balanced. "John Smith" wrote in message ... From working with the gamma match in real life--I have noticed it favors launching the signal from the side of the DE which has the gamma. Now in playing with the gamma formulas, I wondered... What if the gamma rod is replaced with a "gamma tube", same set up as the normal gamma, except the the rod is now a tube surrounding the element which is being fed? Something of a "concentric match", I am guessing the formula to compute concentric line Zo would come into play here, or a near equiv... purpose would be to get rid of the favored increase in signal from the side containing the gamma... I know someone is going to suggest EZNEC--however, I am not good at drawing a tube with it!!!! Warmest regards, John -- Watching the cutting edge of yesterday replay--in virtual reality, right before my eyes--in real time! Thirty year old technology--wasn't it amazing? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|