RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   antenna tuner balun question (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/72231-antenna-tuner-balun-question.html)

Bob Miller June 4th 05 08:48 PM

antenna tuner balun question
 
Having never wound a balun before, pardon if this is an elementary
question, but...

I recently got a Murch 2000B antenna tuner off eBay. It's a commercial
version of the so-called ultimate transmatch. A T-network design.

For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer" according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?

Thanks for any info.

Bob
k5qwg



Cecil Moore June 4th 05 08:58 PM

Bob Miller wrote:
For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer" according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?


It's probably a 4:1 voltage balun which does exhibit
a DC short. That's actually good for cutting down on
static electricity.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

John Smith June 4th 05 09:01 PM

Bob:

Totally normal, in fact, if you check secondary to primary--will also
show continuity--it is normal too...look at a schematic of a torrid
balun on the net, all windings have some sort of connection to all
others... in a "rf transformer" with seperate primary/secondary there
will be electrical isolation between windings...

Warmest regards,
John
"Bob Miller" wrote in message
...
Having never wound a balun before, pardon if this is an elementary
question, but...

I recently got a Murch 2000B antenna tuner off eBay. It's a commercial
version of the so-called ultimate transmatch. A T-network design.

For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer" according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?

Thanks for any info.

Bob
k5qwg





Dave Platt June 4th 05 09:11 PM

In article ,
Bob Miller wrote:

For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer" according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?


Very probably normal... or, at least, to be expected of many types
of balun and thus not diagnostic of a failure. You're probably
reading the DC resistance one or more of the windings, which would be
rather less than an ohm.

Based on what I see in Sevick's book on baluns and ununs, both the
Guanella 4:1 current balun and the various Ruthroff voltage balun
configurations would exhibit this behavior. A Guanella 1:1 with the
center of the load un-grounded would not, nor would a Reisert or W2DU
1:1 balun.

Now, for something completely different. If you want to revisit an
old controversy, and if you're not adverse to modifying a classic
piece of equipment, you might want to review the various debates about
the pros and cons of the Ultimate Transmatch vs. the SPC
configuration. See if you can locate a copy of the August 1981 QST,
and review the Technical Correspondence column on pages 42-43.

As I understand it, the SPC configuration can be shown to have some
significant technical advantages over the Ultimate Transmatch, in terms
of matching range and harmonic attenuation, when the same component
values are used in each. It is reportedly possible to re-wire an
Ultimate into an SPC configuration little or no cost, as both use a
split-stator capacitor (just in different places in the circuit).

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

Bob Miller June 4th 05 09:49 PM

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:11:38 -0000, (Dave Platt)
wrote:

In article ,
Bob Miller wrote:

For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer" according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?


Very probably normal... or, at least, to be expected of many types
of balun and thus not diagnostic of a failure. You're probably
reading the DC resistance one or more of the windings, which would be
rather less than an ohm.

Based on what I see in Sevick's book on baluns and ununs, both the
Guanella 4:1 current balun and the various Ruthroff voltage balun
configurations would exhibit this behavior.


I kinda suspected so, but wasn't sure.

A Guanella 1:1 with the
center of the load un-grounded would not, nor would a Reisert or W2DU
1:1 balun.

Now, for something completely different. If you want to revisit an
old controversy, and if you're not adverse to modifying a classic
piece of equipment, you might want to review the various debates about
the pros and cons of the Ultimate Transmatch vs. the SPC
configuration. See if you can locate a copy of the August 1981 QST,
and review the Technical Correspondence column on pages 42-43.

As I understand it, the SPC configuration can be shown to have some
significant technical advantages over the Ultimate Transmatch, in terms
of matching range and harmonic attenuation, when the same component
values are used in each. It is reportedly possible to re-wire an
Ultimate into an SPC configuration little or no cost, as both use a
split-stator capacitor (just in different places in the circuit).


Thanks, Dave, I have a 1985 arrl handbook that shows the differences
between the Ultimate Transmatch and the SPC circuit, and I also have
some modification instructions on the Murch unit itself, but I haven't
tried changing anything yet. Still playing with it, as it came.

Bob
k5qwg




Bob Miller June 4th 05 09:52 PM

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:58:33 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer" according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?


It's probably a 4:1 voltage balun which does exhibit
a DC short. That's actually good for cutting down on
static electricity.


Thanks, Cecil, I noticed a more up-to-date MFJ tuner doesn't show
continuity across the balanced line terminals; just wanted to make
sure the Murch balun wasn't whacked out.

Bob
k5qwg




John Smith June 4th 05 10:01 PM

Bob:

If you don't mind me asking--how much did you pay for it, I have one in
the barn here I bought as lot with other gear from an estate sale--just
wondering...

John

"Bob Miller" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:11:38 -0000, (Dave Platt)
wrote:

In article ,
Bob Miller wrote:

For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer"
according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across
the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?


Very probably normal... or, at least, to be expected of many types
of balun and thus not diagnostic of a failure. You're probably
reading the DC resistance one or more of the windings, which would be
rather less than an ohm.

Based on what I see in Sevick's book on baluns and ununs, both the
Guanella 4:1 current balun and the various Ruthroff voltage balun
configurations would exhibit this behavior.


I kinda suspected so, but wasn't sure.

A Guanella 1:1 with the
center of the load un-grounded would not, nor would a Reisert or W2DU
1:1 balun.

Now, for something completely different. If you want to revisit an
old controversy, and if you're not adverse to modifying a classic
piece of equipment, you might want to review the various debates about
the pros and cons of the Ultimate Transmatch vs. the SPC
configuration. See if you can locate a copy of the August 1981 QST,
and review the Technical Correspondence column on pages 42-43.

As I understand it, the SPC configuration can be shown to have some
significant technical advantages over the Ultimate Transmatch, in
terms
of matching range and harmonic attenuation, when the same component
values are used in each. It is reportedly possible to re-wire an
Ultimate into an SPC configuration little or no cost, as both use a
split-stator capacitor (just in different places in the circuit).


Thanks, Dave, I have a 1985 arrl handbook that shows the differences
between the Ultimate Transmatch and the SPC circuit, and I also have
some modification instructions on the Murch unit itself, but I haven't
tried changing anything yet. Still playing with it, as it came.

Bob
k5qwg






Bob Miller June 4th 05 10:08 PM

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:58:33 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
For balanced line, it has a "broadband toroidal transformer" according
to the review in a 1980 QST. When I place a VOM multi-meter across the
two balanced line terminals, it shows continuity. Is that normal, or
is the balun cooked or shorted?


It's probably a 4:1 voltage balun which does exhibit
a DC short. That's actually good for cutting down on
static electricity.


Okay, Cecil, Dave, one more elementary question. My copy of the
instructions for the Murch 2000B says the following:

"Connect balanced line to connection marked Balance Line with Jumper
as indicated on back panel."

On the back panel, there's a painted line between the two balanced
line connections. Surely, they don't mean to run a jumper wire between
the two connections *while* a balanced line is attached?

It seems to tune fine without the jumper -- I'm afraid I'd blow
something up with the jumper.

Bob
k5qwg




Bob Miller June 4th 05 10:21 PM

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:01:25 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Bob:

If you don't mind me asking--how much did you pay for it, I have one in
the barn here I bought as lot with other gear from an estate sale--just
wondering...

John


The eBay bidding started at $100. There were 20 bids, and it finally
ended up at $171, plus $20 for shipping.

The case is a little scratched up, but the front panel and inside
components look good.

Bob
k5qwg




John Smith June 4th 05 10:46 PM

WOW, that makes me smile... I am going to dig it out!

Warmest regards,
John

"Bob Miller" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:01:25 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Bob:

If you don't mind me asking--how much did you pay for it, I have one
in
the barn here I bought as lot with other gear from an estate
sale--just
wondering...

John


The eBay bidding started at $100. There were 20 bids, and it finally
ended up at $171, plus $20 for shipping.

The case is a little scratched up, but the front panel and inside
components look good.

Bob
k5qwg






Dave Platt June 4th 05 11:22 PM

In article ,
Bob Miller wrote:

It's probably a 4:1 voltage balun which does exhibit
a DC short. That's actually good for cutting down on
static electricity.


Okay, Cecil, Dave, one more elementary question. My copy of the
instructions for the Murch 2000B says the following:

"Connect balanced line to connection marked Balance Line with Jumper
as indicated on back panel."

On the back panel, there's a painted line between the two balanced
line connections. Surely, they don't mean to run a jumper wire between
the two connections *while* a balanced line is attached?


No, I think the painted line is meant to indicate "the line is
connected to/between these two points." The "jumper" they refer to
probably refers to a short section of balanced line, to be connected
between the transmatch and whatever terminals you use to terminate the
ladder-line or open-wire line when it comes into your shack.

It seems to tune fine without the jumper -- I'm afraid I'd blow
something up with the jumper.


Yeah, you'd be trying to tune a near-short-circuit... often difficult
and the results are less than productive :-)

There are some transmatches in which the balun is normally out of
circuit, and has to be jumpered to the hot side of the unbalanced
output when you want to use it. That *might* be what they're
referring to?

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

Cecil Moore June 5th 05 01:24 AM

Bob Miller wrote:
Okay, Cecil, Dave, one more elementary question. My copy of the
instructions for the Murch 2000B says the following:

"Connect balanced line to connection marked Balance Line with Jumper
as indicated on back panel."

On the back panel, there's a painted line between the two balanced
line connections. Surely, they don't mean to run a jumper wire between
the two connections *while* a balanced line is attached?

It seems to tune fine without the jumper -- I'm afraid I'd blow
something up with the jumper.


If it's like my MFJ-949E, the balun is completely out of the
circuit until the jumper is installed. Without the jumper on
the MFJ, there would be no output at the balanced line
output terminals. Do you have a schematic?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Bob Miller June 5th 05 02:53 AM

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:24:15 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
Okay, Cecil, Dave, one more elementary question. My copy of the
instructions for the Murch 2000B says the following:

"Connect balanced line to connection marked Balance Line with Jumper
as indicated on back panel."

On the back panel, there's a painted line between the two balanced
line connections. Surely, they don't mean to run a jumper wire between
the two connections *while* a balanced line is attached?

It seems to tune fine without the jumper -- I'm afraid I'd blow
something up with the jumper.


If it's like my MFJ-949E, the balun is completely out of the
circuit until the jumper is installed. Without the jumper on
the MFJ, there would be no output at the balanced line
output terminals. Do you have a schematic?


Sorry, I don't have a schematic.

On my MFJ 989c, I have two balanced line connectors. I also have a 3rd
connector for Random Wire, and a 4th odd connector. For balanced line
operation, I install a jumper between the Random Wire and 4th
connectors.

On the Murch 2000B, there are two connectors for balanced line. And a
3rd connector for Random Wire. The directions seem to be saying put a
jumper on the balanced line connectors for balanced line operation.

"Connect any antenna with single wire feed to connection marked Random
Wire. Connect balanced line to connection marked Balanced Line with
Jumper as indicated on back panel." (and there's a painted line
between the Balanced Line connectors.)

If it's helpful, there are pictures, inside & out, of the Murch tuner
at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5757714 402


Bob
k5qwg









Cecil Moore June 5th 05 03:49 AM

Bob Miller wrote:
"Connect any antenna with single wire feed to connection marked Random
Wire. Connect balanced line to connection marked Balanced Line with
Jumper as indicated on back panel." (and there's a painted line
between the Balanced Line connectors.)

If it's helpful, there are pictures, inside & out, of the Murch tuner at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5757714 402


I suspect the jumper wire needs to go between the random wire
terminal and one of the balanced line terminals. That's the
way it is on my MFJ. On the inside, do the balanced line
terminals go anywhere besides the balun?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Dave Platt June 5th 05 04:21 AM

"Connect any antenna with single wire feed to connection marked Random
Wire. Connect balanced line to connection marked Balanced Line with
Jumper as indicated on back panel." (and there's a painted line
between the Balanced Line connectors.)

If it's helpful, there are pictures, inside & out, of the Murch tuner at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5757714 402


I suspect the jumper wire needs to go between the random wire
terminal and one of the balanced line terminals. That's the
way it is on my MFJ. On the inside, do the balanced line
terminals go anywhere besides the balun?


According to one note I saw on the net, many of the Ultimate
Transmatch designs had an internal strap/jumper to connect the
unbalanced tuner circuitry to the balun, when necessary.

I rather strongly suspect that this is the case for the Murch. The
photos show that it has internal switching of the tuner output. The
switch has five positions - 1 2 3 (which I assume correspond
to the three unbalanced jacks) and two I can't really read clearly in
the photo - perhaps the random-wire output, and the balun for the
balanced output?

Sounds to me as if no external hot-to-balun jumper is requires,
especially as the OP reports that it tunes a balanced antenna just fine
without one.

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

Bob Miller June 5th 05 04:21 AM

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 21:49:25 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
"Connect any antenna with single wire feed to connection marked Random
Wire. Connect balanced line to connection marked Balanced Line with
Jumper as indicated on back panel." (and there's a painted line
between the Balanced Line connectors.)

If it's helpful, there are pictures, inside & out, of the Murch tuner at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5757714 402


I suspect the jumper wire needs to go between the random wire
terminal and one of the balanced line terminals. That's the
way it is on my MFJ. On the inside, do the balanced line
terminals go anywhere besides the balun?


One Balanced Line terminal goes to a balun winding wire. The second
Balanced Line terminal goes to another balun winding wire; the second
terminal also has a wire going to the Antenna Selector Switch, which
selects the balanced antenna. The Random Wire terminal has a wire
going to the same Antenna Selector Switch, which also selects the
random wire antenna.

Those are the only wires on these three terminals.

bob
k5qwg




Bob Miller June 5th 05 04:25 AM

On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:21:08 -0000, (Dave Platt)
wrote:

"Connect any antenna with single wire feed to connection marked Random
Wire. Connect balanced line to connection marked Balanced Line with
Jumper as indicated on back panel." (and there's a painted line
between the Balanced Line connectors.)

If it's helpful, there are pictures, inside & out, of the Murch tuner at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5757714 402

I suspect the jumper wire needs to go between the random wire
terminal and one of the balanced line terminals. That's the
way it is on my MFJ. On the inside, do the balanced line
terminals go anywhere besides the balun?


According to one note I saw on the net, many of the Ultimate
Transmatch designs had an internal strap/jumper to connect the
unbalanced tuner circuitry to the balun, when necessary.

I rather strongly suspect that this is the case for the Murch. The
photos show that it has internal switching of the tuner output. The
switch has five positions - 1 2 3 (which I assume correspond
to the three unbalanced jacks) and two I can't really read clearly in
the photo - perhaps the random-wire output, and the balun for the
balanced output?


That's right, the 5-position Antenna switch selects coax 1, 2 and 3,
and R for Random Wire, and BL for balanced line.

bob
k5qwg



Sounds to me as if no external hot-to-balun jumper is requires,
especially as the OP reports that it tunes a balanced antenna just fine
without one.



Cecil Moore June 5th 05 02:42 PM

Bob Miller wrote:
One Balanced Line terminal goes to a balun winding wire. The second
Balanced Line terminal goes to another balun winding wire; the second
terminal also has a wire going to the Antenna Selector Switch, which
selects the balanced antenna.


That's different from the MFJ which has wires from the balanced
output terminals going only to the balun.

The Random Wire terminal has a wire
going to the same Antenna Selector Switch, which also selects the
random wire antenna.


MFJ saved money on the switch by combining the balanced and
random wire functions. Sounds like your tuner has separate
switch settings for balanced and random wire. So I don't
know what that jumper statement is all about.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Fred W4JLE June 5th 05 03:50 PM

The line he is refering to simply indicates which of the three terminals to
connect a balanced line to. It has nothing to do with a jumper.

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Bob Miller wrote:
One Balanced Line terminal goes to a balun winding wire. The second
Balanced Line terminal goes to another balun winding wire; the second
terminal also has a wire going to the Antenna Selector Switch, which
selects the balanced antenna.


That's different from the MFJ which has wires from the balanced
output terminals going only to the balun.

The Random Wire terminal has a wire
going to the same Antenna Selector Switch, which also selects the
random wire antenna.


MFJ saved money on the switch by combining the balanced and
random wire functions. Sounds like your tuner has separate
switch settings for balanced and random wire. So I don't
know what that jumper statement is all about.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000

Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---




Bob Miller June 5th 05 04:21 PM

On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 10:50:17 -0400, "Fred W4JLE"
wrote:

The line he is refering to simply indicates which of the three terminals to
connect a balanced line to. It has nothing to do with a jumper.


Thank you, that's what I finally have figured out -- Murch made
several versions of their tuner; perhaps my copy of the instruction
manual refers to some other version, or maybe they just weren't clear
in what they were trying to say.

Thanks to all...

bob
k5qwg




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com