Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy, thank you so much for taking the time to respond. I am going to go play with W6ELProp right away. I am a very happy EZNEC user... this is how I am finding out the elevation angle of the major lobe, and because it's easy to 'adjust' by varying the height of the antenna, especially at a Field Day site, I want to put it up to maximize coverage of the rest of the country. Thanks again. Regards, Al W6LX P.S. I should probably start a different thread to make this comment, but I am still trying to find a good analysis program to enable simulation of an balanced-line end-fed antenna, sometimes called a Zepp. This evidently is one tough problem to solve. "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... A number of propagation programs can tell you what angle you need. One that's easy to use, reasonably accurate, and free is W6ELProp, available from http://www.qsl.net/w6elprop/. The ideal height for the antenna is a fairly easy geometry problem, but it's easiest to let a program tell you this, too. There are a number of antenna modeling programs available, some of which are free, and all will give very accurate results. Because it's my product, I recommend the free demo version of EZNEC from http://eznec.com, which is entirely adequate for this purpose. But any number of other programs would be suitable also. One bit of advice -- don't get hung up on the "takeoff angle" reported by some antenna analysis programs (like EZNEC). It simply means the angle at which the pattern is maximum, and isn't important for this or most situations. What counts is the field strength or gain at the angle which you'll be using for communication -- that's the angle reported by the propagation program. That's the number you want to maximize. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Al Lorona wrote: Hi, Everybody, How does one determine the correct antenna takeoff angle to communicate over a certain distance? I can't find any references anywhere that discuss this, taking into account all of the variables: height of ionosphere, frequency, etc. Here's a practical example of when it would be important to know this. Say you are going to put up a dipole antenna for 20 meters specifically to communicate to a friend 2000 miles away during the day. The takeoff angle of the major lobe varies widely as the antenna is raised from ground level to 1 wavelength above ground, so presumably there is a 'best' height for the antenna to put the major lobe right where it needs to be to skip to your friend's QTH. The trouble is, we do not seem to have a good way to determine this 'best' height ahead of time. One would, I guess, have to vary the height of the antenna while the other station monitored your signal strength, and one would have to do this over several days, weeks, or months to get good, averaged data. But... isn't there a better way to do this? Regards, Al W6LX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Accuracy of Antenna Testing Ranges | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna |