Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
[regarding elevated radials] the more and the longer the better of course! . . . No, that's not true. The efficiency of a vertical antenna with elevated radials declines noticeably as radial length increases beyond quarter wave resonance. With half wavelength radials, the efficiency can be very poor, depending on soil conditions, the number of radials, and the height. Decreasing the radial length to less than a quarter wavelength doesn't generally hurt the efficiency much. I'd guess that the efficiency would peak again at 3/4 wavelength, but I haven't checked. It's easy to model with EZNEC or similar program, and you can get a fair evaluation of a system with a few radials using the free demo version. I should mention that the resonant length of radials is shorter when close to the ground than it is in free space. This has to be considered when choosing elevated radial length, particularly if the radials aren't very high in terms of wavelength. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
physical 1/4, electrical 1/2 wavelength | Antenna | |||
Radial Wire Antennas - by Peter Chambers | Shortwave | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |