Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:14:32 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Please try again. Indeed, as if a million monkeys would eventually write Hamlet.... The laugh-athon continues Roy's "I don't know's on third!" math. Even with all precision removed (two places is two places too many :-) the rays show absolutely no evidence of refraction (which makes the reflections bogus), and the angles are unmarked (which makes the 10mW labels spurious), and the term irradiance was pulled out of a hat (it is radiant flux - iff we are to believe anything). Back to Optical kindergarten. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Metal film resistors? | Homebrew | |||
New Hitler film sheds new light on unique Finnish recording | Shortwave | |||
Why do we use thin antennas? | Antenna | |||
Tobacco film removal | Boatanchors |