LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old June 16th 05, 06:15 PM
Buck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:56:41 GMT, "Jer"
wrote:

At any rate, if I knew more about my antennas characteristics I might could
figure out the band/end location where it would be loudest at any given
time. Is this all wet, and TOA wouldn't help in that at all?



The TOA will help in any QSO. A low TOA will tend to open you up to
DX QRM such as on 40 meters, but an NVIS with near vertical TOA will
manage more regional communications than DX. You might not even be
bothered by the 500kw SW station in Germany. Of course, the station
you talk to will also have to deal with that station.

Knowing the TOA is as beneficial as knowing where the nuls are on your
beam.




--
73 for now
Buck
N4PGW


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
EZNEC ARRL and EZNEC 4 Demo: Setting default folders Buck Antenna 2 June 16th 05 01:33 AM
EZNEC v. 4.0 at Dayton Roy Lewallen Antenna 0 May 7th 04 06:10 PM
3 antennas modeled with EZNEC Cecil Moore Antenna 56 February 9th 04 09:36 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017