Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walter Maxwell wrote:
Good response, Roy, but concerning rho and gamma to represent reflection coefficient, I refer you to Reflections, Sec 3.1, "Prior to the 1950s rho and sigma, and sometimes 'S' were used to represent standing wave ratio. The symbol of choice to represent reflection coefficient during that era was upper case gamma. However, in 1953 the American Standards Association (now the NIST) announced in its publication ASA Y10.9-1953, that rho is to replace gamma for reflection coefficient, with SWR to represent standing wave ratio (for either voltage or current), and VSWR specifically for voltage standing wave ratio. Most of academia responded to the change, but some individuals did not. Consequently, gamma is occasionally seen representing reflection coefficent, but only rarely." Thanks for the information Walter. I must have a few "rare" texts that use Gamma (Gamma to mean uppercase gamma) for the voltage reflection coefficient. I wonder if the recommendation / standard to which you refer is taken up in any international standard? I do note that my ARRL Antenna Handbook (18th edition) and ARRL Handbook (2000) both use rho, however they reckon that rho=(Za-Zo*)/(Za+Zo) (where Zo* means the conjugate of Zo). They do this without derivation, and seem to be in conflict with the derivation in most texts. I suppose the derivation is buried in some article in QST and in the members only section of the ARRL website. Back to notation, accepting that the preferred pronumeral for the voltage reflection coefficient is rho, is there a pronumeral used for abs(rho)? Owen |