![]() |
Reflection Coefficient
If Rho (or Gamma) is treated as being a magnitude with an angle which,
as one moves backwards along the line, may fall in any of the four quadrants, all those futile arguments about whether or not to use Z or Z* fall by the wayside. Just proceed with calculations in the normal, mathematically legitimate manner and you will arrive at the correct results or conclusions. If you disagree with results or conclusions, and there are no mathematical errors, then it is YOU who must be wrong. It's all part of the learning process. And the magnitude of Rho CAN exceed unity. ---- Reg. |
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... If Rho (or Gamma) is treated as being a magnitude with an angle which, as one moves backwards along the line, may fall in any of the four quadrants, all those futile arguments about whether or not to use Z or Z* fall by the wayside. Just proceed with calculations in the normal, mathematically legitimate manner and you will arrive at the correct results or conclusions. If you disagree with results or conclusions, and there are no mathematical errors, then it is YOU who must be wrong. It's all part of the learning process. And the magnitude of Rho CAN exceed unity. ---- Reg. Amen to that, Reg, Walt, W2DU |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com