Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 17th 03, 03:41 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael wrote:
Dont forget a balanced feedline radiates along the line.


If the currents are balanced, most of the photons are
re-absorbed by the free electrons. OTOH, if the currents
inside a coax feedline are not balanced, an unbalanced
feedline radiates along the line.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 18th 03, 02:04 AM
Michael
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I actually meant to say induced currents not radiated since this is near
field.

Given that the ACA's radiation guidlines talks about near fields and not far
fields its probably appropriate to consider induced currents from open wire
feeders to nearby people.

As most transceivers have an unbalanced output its just as easy to make it
unbalanced at the antenna end of the transmission line anyway unless you
want to use the transmission line as part of the antenna / impedance match.
Then you can be reasonably sure there will be no radiation induced into
humans near your transmission line and be in compliance with the ACA
regulations (and safer for others I guess).



"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Michael wrote:
Dont forget a balanced feedline radiates along the line.


If the currents are balanced, most of the photons are
re-absorbed by the free electrons. OTOH, if the currents
inside a coax feedline are not balanced, an unbalanced
feedline radiates along the line.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



  #3   Report Post  
Old November 18th 03, 02:15 AM
Michael
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michael" wrote in message
...
I actually meant to say induced currents not radiated since this is near
field.

Given that the ACA's radiation guidlines talks about near fields and not

far
fields its probably appropriate to consider induced currents from open

wire
feeders to nearby people.


From memory it specifies maximum volts/area to the distance where person can
gain access to the antenna.

It also mentions a maximum flux/area or it could be a certain induced
current in some standard measurement device I think. I haven't looked at it
for over a year now. It all doesn't matter too much when youre using coax
anyway so then you can use the standard tables they give you.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Ten-tec vee beam Tom Coates Antenna 8 September 21st 03 12:47 AM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017