Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please see comments below...
___________________ "Reg Edwards" wrote (in part): Simultaneous transmission of vertical and and horizontal polarised signals from a single antenna system is impossible without upsetting the desired radiation coverage pattern. Sorry, but that statement is incorrect as it applies to FM broadcasting, at least. There are many commercial FM broadcast transmit antenna designs capable of doing so, for example the cavity-backed radiator (CBR) introduced by Harris Corporation in the U.S, and used for simultaneous transmission of 8-10 FM channels in r.h. circular polarization at 100kW ERP each. Examples are the Senior Road Tower Group in Houston, and Master FM sites in Miami and St Louis. The CBR is a panel type antenna designed to mount on and around the faces of a tower, and has azimuth pattern circularity and axial ratio of less than ~1.5dB on a tower of ~2 meter face width. Other OEMs such as Kathrein, SIRA, ERI, Dielectric etc supply other designs nearly as good. As Cecil says, nobody gains anything power-wise. For the same transmitter radiated power everybody's signals are 3 dB down (half-power) relative to simple linear polarision when both transmitting and receiving antennas have the same polarisation. Incorrect again, at least in the US, where FM broadcast ERP is defined only for horizontally polarized radiation. Therefore the output power of the transmitter itself is raised 3dB so that the station's full, authorized ERP is produced in all radiation planes. In theory, a r.h. CP receiving antenna actually will receive 3dB MORE signal from CP transmission than when linear polarization is used. For CP transmit and linear receive, received field strength would be the same as if the transmit antenna also was linear, with the same ERP in the same plane. The advantage of circular polarisation is that it doesn't matter which polarisation your antenna is orientated because, in practice, when erecting it, the polarisation received by your antenna is usually a matter of guesswork anyway. Only with relatively-rare, direct line-of-sigh it broadcasting propagation is there any certainty in the polarisation of received signals. The full benefit of CP transmission is realized only when a CP receive antenna is used. A CP receive antenna will tend to reject reflections of the transmitted signal (multipath), because the physics of producing the reflection causes a reversal of its polarization sense -- which the CP receive antenna will reject. Reduced multipath content makes for "cleaner" reception. Not too practical in automobiles, though, where it is most needed. RF (retired broadcast engineer - RCA and Harris Corp) Visit http://rfry.org for FM broadcast RF system papers. |