Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The complete text referenced here can be accessed at:
http://eznec.com/misc/food_for_thought/ The first one is "Forward and reverse power" and is much easier to read if it is copied-and-pasted into Word. The first comment is just a nit: "(the current isn't transformed by the half wavelength line either.)" A 1/2 wavelength of transmission line reverses the phase of the current, certainly a 180 degree "transformation". The main point centers around this false statement: "While the nature of the voltage and current waves when encountering an impedance discontinuity is well understood, we're lacking a model of what happens to this "reverse power" we've calculated." Absolutely false! We are not lacking a model. We have time- tested models that people with closed minds simply refuse to consider. One such model is the s-parameter analysis presented in HP's App Note 95-1, available on the web. Quoting: "Another advantage of s-parameters springs from the simple relationship between the variables a1, a2, b1, and b2, and various *POWER WAVES*. ... s-parameters are simply related to power gain and mismatch loss, quantities which are often of more interest than the corresponding voltage functions." (emphasis mine) The model is there. Concrete brains refuse to take a look and instead call it "gobbledegook" (sic). There's another model that agrees 100% with an s-parameter analysis and it is from the field of optics, covered in detail in _Optics_, by Hecht. Non-glare glass works the same way as a 1/4WL matching section in a transmission line. Again the model is there, just ignored by gurus on this newsgroup which leads to demonstrably wrong conclusions on their parts. What happens to the energy in EM light waves has been known and understood for many decades and cannot be understood without an understanding of the laws of physics governing interference between EM waves. Likewise, what happens to the energy in EM RF waves cannot be understood without an understanding of those same laws of physics. There are many posters to r.r.a.a who have no clue about the laws of physics governing interference between EM waves. That ignorance is the entire problem with this discussion. Solution: Alleviate the ignorance. Quoting again from Roy's web page: 'ANY MODEL PRESENTED TO ACCOUNT FOR WHAT HAPPENS TO "FORWARD" AND "REVERSE" POWER AT TRANSMISSION LINE ENDS HAD BETTER GIVE RESULTS THAT AGREE WITH THE ABOVE TABLE.' And, of course, the two above power/energy models agree exactly with Roy's table but that doesn't seem to matter one iota. They are still "gobbledegook" (still sic). -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:05:57 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Non-glare glass works the same way as a 1/4WL matching section in a transmission line. One trivial example that you thoroughly bumbled through every mistake possible, arriving at no answer before abandoning. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Non-glare glass works the same way as a 1/4WL matching section in a transmission line. One trivial example that you thoroughly bumbled through every mistake possible, arriving at no answer before abandoning. It was an example for Jim Kelley to respond to. He declined to discuss it, nobody else (including you) responded with any technical content, so the thread was abandoned. If you have anything technical to contribute, feel free to fire it up again. That happens a lot on this newsgroup. When someone realizes that he is about to be proven wrong in public, he simply goes away - human nature. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Richard Clark wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Non-glare glass works the same way as a 1/4WL matching section in a transmission line. One trivial example that you thoroughly bumbled through every mistake possible, arriving at no answer before abandoning. It was an example for Jim Kelley to respond to. He declined to discuss it, nobody else (including you) responded with any technical content, so the thread was abandoned. If you have anything technical to contribute, feel free to fire it up again. That happens a lot on this newsgroup. When someone realizes that he is about to be proven wrong in public, he simply goes away - human nature. Cecil, you never actually prove anyone wrong, you just get excited and irrational whenever anyone disagrees with you. You're confusing the fear of being proven wrong with just giving up in disgust at your silly antics. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly wrote:
You're confusing the fear of being proven wrong with just giving up in disgust at your silly antics. More of the same personal stuff. How about some technical content for a change? -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:14:36 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: More of the same personal stuff. How about some technical content for a change? http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/weblaser.GIF (which I am sure you will soon hustle off in embarrassment) For an angle of incidence of 30° How much power is reflected from Surface A (first incidence)? How much power is reflected from Surface B (first incidence)? How much power is transmitted through all interfaces? :-) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:43:24 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: That happens a lot on this newsgroup. When someone realizes that he is about to be proven wrong in public, he simply goes away - human nature. No doubt this is a set up for abandoning my other question in this thread Message-ID: |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil. W5DXP wrote:
"A 1/2-wavelength of transmission line reverses the phase of the current, certainly a 180 degree "transformation"." Yes. One of the baluns in the ARRL Antenna Book uses an extra180-degrees of 75-ohm coax to drive an element in a 300-ohm balanced antenna from an unbalanced 75-ohm aource. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Yes. One of the baluns in the ARRL Antenna Book uses an extra180-degrees of 75-ohm coax to drive an element in a 300-ohm balanced antenna from an unbalanced 75-ohm aource. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI A standard in the VHF and up world; it is used in the T-match. Question - has anyone ever done any analysis or testing of what happens to a T-match when run off the center frequency of the balun? tom K0TAR |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:43:53 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote: Richard Harrison wrote: Yes. One of the baluns in the ARRL Antenna Book uses an extra180-degrees of 75-ohm coax to drive an element in a 300-ohm balanced antenna from an unbalanced 75-ohm aource. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI A standard in the VHF and up world; it is used in the T-match. Question - has anyone ever done any analysis or testing of what happens to a T-match when run off the center frequency of the balun? Your question is not clear. Are you asking about tee-match performance or balun performance? There has been an examination of the balun performance. "The Half-Wave Balun: theory and application", J Nagle, K4KJ, ham radio magazine, Sept 1980 pp 32-35 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Antenna Matching Question | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |