Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The fact is nobody knows the dielectric loss of polyethylene. It is
too small to measure samples in a bridge. The materials of which the bridge is made have losses of the same order. The slightest unavoidable impurities and contamination during production cause wide variations in D. Coaxial line Attenuation = A*Sqrt(F) + B*F The most accurate way to estimate D at HF is to measure attenuation versus frequency over a wide frequency range on several miles of solid polyethylene coaxial line. Then separate the constants A and B by plotting on graph paper Attenuation/Sqrt(F) versus Sqrt(F). and then do a few simple calculations. I have performed this operation several times during acceptance tests on newly laid cables. The cable insulation was mainly air-spaced with the inner conductor being supported by polyethylene disks at 1.5" intervals. D can vary noticeably from one length of cable to another manufactured from a different batch of nominally identical materials. I have also measured attenuation on many miles of 1" diameter solid polyethylene submarine cable and determined quality of the insulation by this graphical means. It is necessary to make attenuation measurements very accurately by the substitution method against standard attenuators. But for comparison, I have never measured the relative junk used by radio amateurs. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Modeling TL "dielectric" loss | Antenna | |||
VF, low-loss line, high-impedence line - relationship | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
The two sorts of loss | Antenna |