Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 21st 05, 05:20 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

straightman:
The net result is that there is still no
vectoral addition that blacks out the light bulb simply because you
can exhibit "away from and toward directions."


[.... Ta-da-dum!]

stooge:
A light bulb does not emit coherent light so your
statement is 100% irrelevant to coherent RF sources
and/or coherent laser sources.


straightman:
And if that source WERE entirely coherent?

[Ba-Boom!]

scientist (wearing white lab coat steps from behind curtain):
The observer would still perceive as much light;
and absolutely none of it would destructively/constructively
interfere.

Simply because the source can exhibit "away from and toward
directions" is wholly immaterial. Direction vectors and power
have nothing to do here.

[voice over and closing music]:
Ladies and gentlemen. The experiments performed here
should not be attempted at home. Further, please do not
plonk the stooge on stage as his performance is part of our
audience's instruction and distracts their attention.

We thank your patronage and look forward to more skits. :-)
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 01:19 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
straightman:
And if that source WERE entirely coherent?


If that source were entirely coherent, superposition
between the forward waves and reflected waves would
result, obeying the laws of physics. Some areas could
be very bright obeying the total constructive interference
equation. Some areas could be totally black obeying the
total destructive interference equation. You really
should read _Optics_, by Hecht and get back to us.

The above is EXACTLY how antenna radiation patterns
are achieved.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 04:21 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:19:23 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Some areas could be

You might already be a winner!

Is that you? Are you really Ed McMahon? Have you stopped drinking
since Johnny died?

.... Oh, sorry, Skitch Henderson? When did you pick up the contract
for Publisher's Clearing house?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... running dogg Shortwave 3 March 13th 05 10:59 PM
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 [email protected] Shortwave 0 December 10th 04 04:36 PM
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? ScanGwinnett Scanner 5 July 12th 04 02:09 PM
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? ScanGwinnett Shortwave 5 July 12th 04 02:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017