Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: So what is E^ x H^? According to Born and Wolf, it's "an abstraction that introduces a certain degree of arbitrariness". On the other hand it's integral over a volume is described as something from which "no unambiguous conclusion can be drawn". So, is that what you're hangin' your hat on, there Cecil? Actually, the Poynting Vector is extremely well defined *AND* well accepted in the RF engineering community. Do you really reject the Poynting Vector concept? If so, that explains everything. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
THIS will solve that pesky Darfur problem... | Shortwave | |||
(OT) - Solve The Beal Conjecture and win $100,000 | Shortwave | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Scanner | |||
Audio problem when using an antenna multicoupler, how to solve? | Shortwave |