You've got the measure of FRANCES TURNIP-SMELLY!

"NunYa Bidness" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:35:22 GMT, Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
Gave us:

Usenet?
on
it
You act as if you haven't been in Usenet more than two months, and
then act as if you are a twelve year old adolescent twit when you
decide that long accepted standards no longer apply, or do not apply
to you. Get a clue, dumbass.

sdrawkcab is backwards spelt backwards!

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:59:26 GMT, NunYa Bidness
wrote:
Placing your answer in front of the text you are replying to IS
backwards, ass.
Not only is it backwards ... it is also backward!

Hey, what a good idea!

"Richard Fry" wrote in message
...
I will post this at both the bottom and top, trying to please everybody at
once.

I will post this at both the bottom and top, trying to please everybody at
once.

Hey, what a good idea!

In view of the Childish Broadcast (CB) quoted below,
would it be fair to assume that "NunYa Bidness" is some
kind of infantile CBer handle?

"NunYa Bidness" wrote in message
...
..

If you are skipping posts in threads which you were at one time
reading, you have some serious skills problems that go far beyond your
simplistic laziness to use more than one clic per post. You have the
mentality of a high school drop-out.

Right on!

"Ham op" wrote in message
news
You haven't given one logical reason to bottom post.

You revert to name calling, insults, IQ assassination, challenging my IQ,
while clearly demonstrating your IQ. Give a positive benefit of bottom
posting, other than that's the way it's done, specially when a post may be
very long, several pages or more, that requires scrolling through to
locate your asinine answer. I could read your answer immediately and
simply ignore it, if it were TOP POSTED.

NunYa Bidness wrote:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:41:09 -0700, "John Smith"
Gave us:


Some people have been sold the line that there is something leet about
bottom posting--obviously they haven't a clue... but even think they fool
others!


Your an utter idiot.

What a well-reasoned argument in favour of top-posting!

"NunYa Bidness" wrote in message
...
You do not understand what Usenet is then. It isn't a message board
between two folks having a conversation, it IS a place where such
conversations can benefit any and all that read them. The entire
point of proper posting is so that ANY person popping into the group
for a read, can garner the entire idea of a post *without* having to
go find, download, and plow through a number of others to do it.

So that they will decrease with increasing time?

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...

But how are they going to solve the Rio "street-kids" problem then?

Bring them over here and employ them as arithmetic teachers.

Polymath wrote:
You've got the measure of FRANCES TURNIP-SMELLY!

At least I can use a measure rather than a micrometer.
....(_!_)...

Frank:

Pull up your pants!

John

"Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" wrote in message
...
Polymath wrote:
You've got the measure of FRANCES TURNIP-SMELLY!

At least I can use a measure rather than a micrometer.
...(_!_)...

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:28:13 -0700, "John Smith"
Gave us:

NunYa:

Do you even know about that man you just insulted?

It doesn't matter, you non-conformal twit!

I grew up reading articles of his in publications.

Good for you.

You picked the wrong
personality there... you just DO NOT realize EXACTLY how much you have
telegraphed your stupidity--but trust me, you could NOT have done it better...

Bull****. The words I wrote are spot on.

You would be hard pressed to ever prove yourself his equal...

I am not trying to. What I am trying to do is to get you idiots to
realize that putting your bull**** above what you are replying to is
about as retarded as it gets, dumbass.