Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ok - now you know the facts - here are the questions: 1) A friend recommended I elevate the feedpoint only to 32' because (he says) it'll work better at a multiple of a 1/4 wavelength. Is this true? NO...doesn't matter. At the heights you are talking about on 40m (40'), the higher the better. 2) What can I expect in performance improvement at either 32' or 40' off the ground? The house is all wood construction with an asphalt shingle roof. Either will be a big improvement over your current 20', but two 10' masts might not be stable enough without some guying. Tor N4OGW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
dipole question | Antenna | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna |