Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Platt" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:08 PM Subject: Raising a 40m dipole.....It's up! Now what? snip If the ladder line is cut to be an integral number of electrical half-wavelengths, it would mirror the antenna feedpoint impedance to the coax. There's be a good match, the SWR on the coax would be somewhere between 1:1 and 1.5:1, and the rig would quite possibly be happy without even needing its internal ATU. This is Good. On the other hand, if the ladder line is an odd number of quarter-wavelengths, it would transform the antenna's feedpoint impedance up to a much higher value (in excess of 1000 ohms). This would result in a severe mismatch at the ladder-line/coax joining point, and a high SWR on the coax. I'd expect both high losses, and a significant amount of RF appearing on the coax braid (the coiled-coax choke balun wouldn't have enough choking reactance). The rig's ATU might not be able to match this load at all. This would be Bad. snip Would that explain why my tuner can only get a 2.6:1 match on 12m with a 50 foot section of ladder line? Here's my (probably wrong) math: ((246/24.940)(0.92)5)= 45'4.5" That's 246 / Freq x Velocity Factor x 5 (odd quarter wavelength) On a related issue, my lowest SWR went from a broad 1.6:1 to a narrow 1.1:1 after it stopped raining. Was that the wet asphault shingles effecting the ladder line or just the wet ladder line? If it's the shingles, I could elevate the line but either way, my tuner handles it. Should I care? I've now plotted the SWR and (dry), the curve is nearly the same as it was before I raised the antenna - it's just centered about 45 khz higher and a bit narrower. This is with the tuner in bypass mode. Thanks for all the help, guys! Ken -- Just my 2¢... 73 es gd dx de Ken KGØWX Grid EM17ip, Flying Pigs #-1055 Proud builder & owner of Elecraft K2 #4913 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Bessler wrote:
((246/24.940)(0.92)5)= 45'4.5" That's 246 / Freq x Velocity Factor x 5 (odd quarter wavelength) Calculated values rarely ever take all the variables into account. Virtually all calculated values have to be adjusted, i.e. cut and tried, to achieve the desired results. What SWR do you get when you increase the length by one foot? What SWR do you get when you decrease the length by one foot? On a related issue, my lowest SWR went from a broad 1.6:1 to a narrow 1.1:1 after it stopped raining. Was that the wet asphault shingles effecting the ladder line or just the wet ladder line? If it's the shingles, I could elevate the line but either way, my tuner handles it. Should I care? Do you care? :-) It is a good idea to keep ladder-line a few inches away from anything that might adversely affect it. That includes wet asphalt shingles. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Raising a 40m dipole | Antenna | |||
dipole question | Antenna | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna |