Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 27th 05, 04:59 PM
Ken Bessler
 
Posts: n/a
Default

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Platt"
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:08 PM
Subject: Raising a 40m dipole.....It's up! Now what?

snip

If the ladder line is cut to be an integral number of electrical
half-wavelengths, it would mirror the antenna feedpoint impedance to
the coax. There's be a good match, the SWR on the coax would be
somewhere between 1:1 and 1.5:1, and the rig would quite possibly be
happy without even needing its internal ATU. This is Good.

On the other hand, if the ladder line is an odd number of
quarter-wavelengths, it would transform the antenna's feedpoint
impedance up to a much higher value (in excess of 1000 ohms). This
would result in a severe mismatch at the ladder-line/coax joining
point, and a high SWR on the coax. I'd expect both high losses, and a
significant amount of RF appearing on the coax braid (the coiled-coax
choke balun wouldn't have enough choking reactance). The rig's ATU
might not be able to match this load at all. This would be Bad.

snip

Would that explain why my tuner can only get a 2.6:1 match on 12m
with a 50 foot section of ladder line? Here's my (probably wrong) math:

((246/24.940)(0.92)5)= 45'4.5"

That's 246 / Freq x Velocity Factor x 5 (odd quarter wavelength)

On a related issue, my lowest SWR went from a broad 1.6:1 to a
narrow 1.1:1 after it stopped raining. Was that the wet asphault shingles
effecting the ladder line or just the wet ladder line? If it's the shingles,
I could elevate the line but either way, my tuner handles it. Should I care?

I've now plotted the SWR and (dry), the curve is nearly the same
as it was before I raised the antenna - it's just centered about 45 khz
higher and a bit narrower. This is with the tuner in bypass mode.

Thanks for all the help, guys!

Ken
--
Just my 2¢... 73 es gd dx de Ken KGØWX
Grid EM17ip, Flying Pigs #-1055
Proud builder & owner of Elecraft K2 #4913


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 27th 05, 06:18 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ken Bessler wrote:
((246/24.940)(0.92)5)= 45'4.5"

That's 246 / Freq x Velocity Factor x 5 (odd quarter wavelength)


Calculated values rarely ever take all the variables into account.
Virtually all calculated values have to be adjusted, i.e. cut
and tried, to achieve the desired results. What SWR do you get
when you increase the length by one foot? What SWR do you get
when you decrease the length by one foot?

On a related issue, my lowest SWR went from a broad 1.6:1 to a
narrow 1.1:1 after it stopped raining. Was that the wet asphault shingles
effecting the ladder line or just the wet ladder line? If it's the shingles,
I could elevate the line but either way, my tuner handles it. Should I care?


Do you care? :-) It is a good idea to keep ladder-line a few
inches away from anything that might adversely affect it. That
includes wet asphalt shingles.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Raising a 40m dipole Ken Bessler Antenna 2 July 25th 05 07:43 PM
dipole question [email protected] Antenna 4 July 6th 05 04:31 PM
How to measure soil constants at HF Reg Edwards Antenna 104 June 25th 05 10:46 PM
Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience Jim Leder Antenna 9 February 22nd 05 11:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017