Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Tope wrote:
Will the value of inductive reactance needed to "resonate" my loaded transmission line vary with the delay and or form factor of the parallel loading inductors, or will this value be fixed and equal to the value of inductive reactance required when I was using the ideal "black box" inductors? Hopefully you alll see where I am going with this. What say, Gents? Hi Mike, good posting. I admire open, questioning minds. I just added some information on this subject to my web page. Although there is some relationship between inductance and delay, I hardly had to mention inductance at all. The phases of the forward current and reflected current are changing in opposite directions. Given any delay at all, the magnitude of the net current will change through the coil (given a typical mobile antenna coil). The electrical length of a mobile antenna loading coil can be approximated by finding the angle whose cosine is (net top current)/(net bottom current). Note that this estimate works for loading coils installed in electrical 1/4WL monopoles or electrical 1/2WL dipoles, not for the general case. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |