Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Keith wrote:
The current through the coil is not the issue as far as my "camp" is concerned. Apparently it isn't now, but it was quite an issue for a while there. Initially it seemed the only correct point of view was the one which held that loading coils behave strictly as lumped inductances. Remember that? The issue as far as I'm concerned is: does this taper drastically cause error in modeling compared to lumped elements? I think the answer is essentially, no. For me the issue was always whether current can be unequal at opposite ends of an inductor. I find the fact that it can to be very interesting, and I wanted to understand just how it could be so. I guess I'm just not willing to accept the notion that just because fundamentals such as these may be inconsequential to how well an antenna is modeled, that they are also inconsequential to a thorough understanding of how it works. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |