Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need your advice, as I have never worked with open wire lines before.
I need to feed many different antennas with open wire line and need to run the feeline from each about 200 feet from the back pasture to the shack. I don't want to walk out 200 feet and throw knife switches to chose the antenna/feedline I want to feed, so I plan to run separate 600 ohm open feeds for each antenna all the way to the shack. The problem is I don't know what the effect is or how to handle the multiple open wire feed lines, as they will be parallel for probably 150-200 feet. I haven't found anything in literature describing this. For instance, will they interact? how far do you space the feedlines from one another? If I have 4 feedlines, can I stack them vertically or horizontally one foot apart from each other? How much is enough separation? What other precautions do I need? Need they be twisted if they are not near anything other than the other feed lines? Any help is appreciated. 73, Greg, N6GK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:43:34 -0700, "greg knapp 5"
wrote: If I have 4 feedlines, can I stack them vertically or horizontally one foot apart from each other? How much is enough separation? What other precautions do I need? Need they be twisted if they are not near anything other than the other feed lines? Any help is appreciated. Hi Greg, Feed lines that are terminated in balanced loads are self isolating. The balance of the load is with respect to earth and is discussed under the heading of Common Modality. So your problems are load defined, not line defined. Naturally there is a continuum of linkage between lines even in this best of all possible worlds. That continuum spans from considerable-to-miniscule and it is, as you have guessed, dependant upon spacing. What constitutes considerable may be miniscule for another and I will leave that determination up to you, as you have offered no limits nor quantitative concerns. If you need a rule of thumb, keep all lines at least 10 times their own pair-spacing apart. That is, if a twin lead has 1 inch spacing between the conductors, keep that twin lead 10 inches from a similar feedline. There are no doubt authoritative reports to offer a justification for this rule, or any other offered. I would expect this would come from Laport's work (which several correspondents here have copies of). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"greg knapp 5" wrote in message
... I need your advice, as I have never worked with open wire lines before. I need to feed many different antennas with open wire line and need to run the feeline from each about 200 feet from the back pasture to the shack. I don't want to walk out 200 feet and throw knife switches to chose the antenna/feedline I want to feed, so I plan to run separate 600 ohm open feeds for each antenna all the way to the shack. The problem is I don't know what the effect is or how to handle the multiple open wire feed lines, as they will be parallel for probably 150-200 feet. I haven't found anything in literature describing this. For instance, will they interact? how far do you space the feedlines from one another? If I have 4 feedlines, can I stack them vertically or horizontally one foot apart from each other? How much is enough separation? What other precautions do I need? Need they be twisted if they are not near anything other than the other feed lines? Any help is appreciated. 73, Greg, N6GK Hi Greg: I have just run a free space NEC 2 model of a pair of horizontally positioned 6" wide, 600 ohm, transmission lines, vertically separated by 12". The model was run from 29 to 31 MHz. On 30 MHz , with both lines terminated in 600 ohms the isolation was about 39 dB. With both lines terminated in 6,000 ohms the isolation improved to 66 dB. The actual range of impedances will be much higher, and complex, but it does give an idea of the order of magnitude of the isolation. The calculation is based on the ratio of the peak currents observed. Hope this helps, 73, Frank (VE6CB) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why not just run one pair. Then split off at the end with the antennas.
The signal will take the path of least resistance, so the most likely antenna for the job will be chosen automatically. The ones with high Z will resist. Resistance is not futile. My 2¢ (that "¢" key was tough to find) "greg knapp 5" wrote in message ... I need your advice, as I have never worked with open wire lines before. I need to feed many different antennas with open wire line and need to run the feeline from each about 200 feet from the back pasture to the shack. I don't want to walk out 200 feet and throw knife switches to chose the antenna/feedline I want to feed, so I plan to run separate 600 ohm open feeds for each antenna all the way to the shack. The problem is I don't know what the effect is or how to handle the multiple open wire feed lines, as they will be parallel for probably 150-200 feet. I haven't found anything in literature describing this. For instance, will they interact? how far do you space the feedlines from one another? If I have 4 feedlines, can I stack them vertically or horizontally one foot apart from each other? How much is enough separation? What other precautions do I need? Need they be twisted if they are not near anything other than the other feed lines? Any help is appreciated. 73, Greg, N6GK |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the $.02 worth...it would be a good idea for me, but I will have
several antennas (of various types - dipoles, vee beams, etc.) capable of being used for the same band, but at different angles from each other. I hate to "share" my antennas and mess up the patterns I want to use. I thought about switching way out back, but kind of hard to do A-B testing when I have a 500 foot run to switch the antennas and get back to the shack! I'm too old for that! "Hal Rosser" wrote in message ... Why not just run one pair. Then split off at the end with the antennas. The signal will take the path of least resistance, so the most likely antenna for the job will be chosen automatically. The ones with high Z will resist. Resistance is not futile. My 2¢ (that "¢" key was tough to find) "greg knapp 5" wrote in message ... I need your advice, as I have never worked with open wire lines before. I need to feed many different antennas with open wire line and need to run the feeline from each about 200 feet from the back pasture to the shack. I don't want to walk out 200 feet and throw knife switches to chose the antenna/feedline I want to feed, so I plan to run separate 600 ohm open feeds for each antenna all the way to the shack. The problem is I don't know what the effect is or how to handle the multiple open wire feed lines, as they will be parallel for probably 150-200 feet. I haven't found anything in literature describing this. For instance, will they interact? how far do you space the feedlines from one another? If I have 4 feedlines, can I stack them vertically or horizontally one foot apart from each other? How much is enough separation? What other precautions do I need? Need they be twisted if they are not near anything other than the other feed lines? Any help is appreciated. 73, Greg, N6GK |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Frank for running the program and for the results. They give me a
good confirmation of what Riachard Clark showed me, I need to get more space between these feeds than I was planning on. If I had 3 feeds, I guess I ought to have a cross arm on my wood/PVC poles coming in and spread the feeds by about two feet to minimize the interaction down to a miniscule amount. I really do want to feed the antennas separately. Gee, I wonder what W6AM used to do with his 10 or 12 rhombics fed with open wire all coming into his home... 73, Greg, N6GK "Frank" wrote in message news:xqNHe.177484$tt5.93925@edtnps90... "greg knapp 5" wrote in message ... I need your advice, as I have never worked with open wire lines before. I need to feed many different antennas with open wire line and need to run the feeline from each about 200 feet from the back pasture to the shack. I don't want to walk out 200 feet and throw knife switches to chose the antenna/feedline I want to feed, so I plan to run separate 600 ohm open feeds for each antenna all the way to the shack. The problem is I don't know what the effect is or how to handle the multiple open wire feed lines, as they will be parallel for probably 150-200 feet. I haven't found anything in literature describing this. For instance, will they interact? how far do you space the feedlines from one another? If I have 4 feedlines, can I stack them vertically or horizontally one foot apart from each other? How much is enough separation? What other precautions do I need? Need they be twisted if they are not near anything other than the other feed lines? Any help is appreciated. 73, Greg, N6GK Hi Greg: I have just run a free space NEC 2 model of a pair of horizontally positioned 6" wide, 600 ohm, transmission lines, vertically separated by 12". The model was run from 29 to 31 MHz. On 30 MHz , with both lines terminated in 600 ohms the isolation was about 39 dB. With both lines terminated in 6,000 ohms the isolation improved to 66 dB. The actual range of impedances will be much higher, and complex, but it does give an idea of the order of magnitude of the isolation. The calculation is based on the ratio of the peak currents observed. Hope this helps, 73, Frank (VE6CB) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, then if I had 6" spacing, it would have to be 5 feet from the nearest
other feed line! With the three lines I want to bring in, that is a cross pole of 10 feet! Wow...I better consider using my old 450 ohm window ladder line with about 1.x inch spacing so I can get down to a reasonable spread! This is really opening my eyes up to the logistics of running this type of feedline...low loss, but definitely more expense, bother, etc. than running a bunch of coax lines! It almost makes me want to put up resonant antennas (like parallel dipoles, fed with a balun and coax...so much easier!). I'm going to have to think this through some more. Thanks for the input, Greg, N6GK "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:43:34 -0700, "greg knapp 5" wrote: If I have 4 feedlines, can I stack them vertically or horizontally one foot apart from each other? How much is enough separation? What other precautions do I need? Need they be twisted if they are not near anything other than the other feed lines? Any help is appreciated. Hi Greg, Feed lines that are terminated in balanced loads are self isolating. The balance of the load is with respect to earth and is discussed under the heading of Common Modality. So your problems are load defined, not line defined. Naturally there is a continuum of linkage between lines even in this best of all possible worlds. That continuum spans from considerable-to-miniscule and it is, as you have guessed, dependant upon spacing. What constitutes considerable may be miniscule for another and I will leave that determination up to you, as you have offered no limits nor quantitative concerns. If you need a rule of thumb, keep all lines at least 10 times their own pair-spacing apart. That is, if a twin lead has 1 inch spacing between the conductors, keep that twin lead 10 inches from a similar feedline. There are no doubt authoritative reports to offer a justification for this rule, or any other offered. I would expect this would come from Laport's work (which several correspondents here have copies of). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:41:42 -0700, "greg knapp 5"
wrote: Wow, then if I had 6" spacing, it would have to be 5 feet from the nearest other feed line! Hi Greg, Not really, you haven't told us how important the coupling factor is yet. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:41:42 -0700, "greg knapp 5"
wrote: Wow, then if I had 6" spacing, it would have to be 5 feet from the nearest other feed line! With the three lines I want to bring in, that is a cross pole of 10 feet! Wow...I better consider using my old 450 ohm window ladder line with about 1.x inch spacing so I can get down to a reasonable spread! This is really opening my eyes up to the logistics of running this type of feedline...low loss, but definitely more expense, bother, etc. than running a bunch of coax lines! It almost makes me want to put up resonant antennas (like parallel dipoles, fed with a balun and coax...so much easier!). I'm going to have to think this through some more. I worked in HF radio stations briefly a long time ago, and the practice there was, IIRC, two wire lines of 3mm HDC with 200mm spacing so they were around 600 ohms 'ish. There were also some 4 wire lines with similar spacing (in a box config). These lines were strung out on pole routes with separation about double the wire spacing. I can't remember now if there were periodic polarity reversals. These were at rx only or tx only facilities, so receiver de-sense was not an issue. Do you need full duplex? Clearly, the closer the lines the higher crosstalk (coupling from one line to another), and presumably, twisted lines will have lower crosstalk (think about the cat5 etc data cables). Don't forget, that the antennas at the far end are coupled, and achieving crosstalk of -100dB might not materially improve the solution! A pole route carrying a number of lines is a pretty serious project (installation and maintenance). I would also look around at remote switching solutions or multiband antennas to see if you can minimise the number of lines you need to string. Owen -- |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Knapp wrote:
"I need to feed many different antennas with open wire line and need to run the feedline from each about 200 feet from the back pasture to the shack." This is similar to the problem facing commercial shortwave stations. They usually have more distance and numbers of antennas and transmitters to serve several target areas simultaneously. The preferred solution is a feedline for each antenna. These separate lines converge on the switching location near the plant. Each transmitter is equipped with its own feedline too. These converge on the switching location too. In the "crossbar" switching arrangement, any transmitter may be connected to any antenna. Very flexible and it works well. When separate lines are too extravagant, a single line is switched at both ends between some transmitters and some antennas. You need at least as many lines as you have transmitters if all are going to operate at once and not in parallel. Most commercial stations have multiband radios but use narrowband antenna systems. This requires many more antennas than transmitters to serve many different targets in various bands required on the various paths around the clock. If you had only one direction or sense to serve, a single rhombic connected by a single line to the transmitter might do a compromised job. The rhombic will take a load at almost any frequency, but its pattern changes with frequency so its coverage of a target won`t be ideal at most frequencies. If you don`t want to walk 200 feet to switch antennas, use relays controlled from your shack. That`s what professionals do. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Adding lengths to bare wire antenna? | Antenna | |||
FA: Open Wire Feeder Insulators | Swap | |||
Open Wire Feeder Switching Ideas ? | Antenna | |||
WTB: 2" spreaders for open wire line | Antenna | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Swap |