Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That should have been more radials DECREASE the bandwidth.
Sorry, Jon W3JT On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:29:49 -0400, J. Teske wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:17:01 GMT, Paul Hinman wrote: I came across an interesting antenna the other day on the web. It called for four radials for each band that one would want to use it on. In order to protect the lawn mower I would like to bury the radials. If I use insulated wires for the radials can I bury multiple radials for different frequencies in the same trench. I would rent a small trencher like they use for underground power and utility feeds, make four trenches and drop in the radials, then cover them. Thanx for any responses. Paul VE6LDS A trencher is far overkill. Any sufficiently hard disk can cut through the turf and inch or so. That is all that is needed for burying a radial. I have about 30 radials for a Butternut Ground plane. I used an old circular saw blade which I put on an improvised axle to cut through the turf. I used whatever wire I had on hand at the time, some bare, some insulated. It works fine. One thing to notice though is that more radials will somewhat increase the bandwidth of the antenna, but not anything which can't be overcome with a transmatch. The radials do have to be radial from the antenna. If you crave super efficiency though you may have to go to the extremes of Jerry Sevcik (sp) who wrote a series of articles and books on vertical antennas in the 70's. I have nearly 200 countries though with just the Butternut and about 100 watts so you will get out. Jon W3JT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sharing one antenna among two transceivers? | Antenna | |||
P2P FILE SHARING | General | |||
SSTV is men sharing dirty pics! | Shortwave |