Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
. . . My only criticism of B.L & E is that they forgot to measure soil resistivity before leaving the site. And apparently, nobody has ever bothered to go back and do it for them. What would you suggest as a method of measuring the RF ground resistivity to a depth of 17 - 100 feet (3 skin depths at 3 MHz for the range of likely resistivities)? Assuming it's very likely that the resistivity would be quite different at different depths within that range, how should they have used that information? How would you use that information if someone "bothered to go back and do it for them"? Reg, all signs point to your being seriously in need of a holiday. How about a little trip to New Jersey to show us Yanks how it should have been done? For less than the price of a couple of bottles of decent wine, you can buy everything you'll need -- bucket, pocket DVM, trowel -- right there, so you won't even have to carry any equipment with you. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
Why a Short Lightning Ground? | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |