Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lee" wrote - i`m currently playing with a helical on 40 and am thinking of making a dipole with a matching helical, i can get that in my postage stamp garden ...... ================================== A back-to-back horizontal helical dipole is a good proposition. Radiating efficiency is what matters with physically small antennas. The radiating pattern is whatever you happen to get. A 1/2-wave helical resonant dipole is considerably more efficient than a 1/4-wave vertical simply because of the absence of ground connection losses. A low dipole does have a small ground loss due to its proximity to ground. Ideally its height should be at least equal to its overall length but half that is a satisfactory compromise. A horizontal helical dipole is the same as a centre-loaded wire with a very long loading coil. It is easier to match to a feedline than a vertical and there is a choice of type of line and line impedance. Either coax or balanced line can be used. Make the loading coil continuous through the antenna centre and enclose the centre with a link coupling to the feedline. The number of turns on the coupling link is dependent on line impedance. The antenna itself is electrically isolated from the line and remains nicely balanced about ground. The greater the diameter of the loading coil former, a rigid plastic pipe, and the thicker the wire, the higher the efficiency. For 100 watts transmitters, close wound turns of thick enamelled wire are usually OK. Resonant frequency is adjusted by pruning the length of the wire or rods which extend beyond the ends of the coil. If essential due to space limitations, the end wires can be allowed to fall down towards the ground but not allowed to swing about in the wind. Short loaded antennas are essentially single frequency, very narrow bandwidth devices. Download program MIDLOAD from website below. It may be of assistance or at least provide you with something to think about. In postage-stamp backyards, size-for-size, Magloops are the most efficient of all very small antennas and can cover several adjacent bands, but are deceptively difficult/easy/expensive to construct depending on your ingenuity. Download program MAGLOOP4. ---- .................................................. .......... Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.btinternet.com/~g4fgq.regp .................................................. .......... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna |