RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   The Cavity Magnetron. (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/78731-cavity-magnetron.html)

Reg Edwards September 24th 05 07:21 AM

The Cavity Magnetron.
 
Copied from the UK Amateur Radio Newsgroup.

===================================
"Joe McElvenney" wrote
Randall and Boot's cavity magnetron
didn't really come onto the scene until about 1940.

===================================

R & B's cavity magnetron was developed at Birmingham University in the
midst of the air raids on that industrial city. We can imagine R & B
having to hide under the workbench whenever a descending bomb was
heard, culminating in a loud bang and broken glass.

The ingenious device generated a peak pulse power of 50 kilowatts at
3000 MHz. Pulse repetition frequency 400 Hz. Pulse width 1
microsecond. So far as I can remember there were 6 or 8 cavities
milled into the copper block. Alternate anodes surrounding the
cathode, and close to it, were strapped together at their ends via
copper bars. The block diameter was about 2" and about 1" thick. The
magnet was a U-shape with pole-pieces which closely fitted the flat
ends round the block such that the magnetic field was parallel to the
cathode.

Because the luftwaffer in 1940/1 had more bombers than the RAF, and in
view of its potential as a war weapon, Churchill personally banned
installation in RAF aircraft in case the top-secret device should be
shot down over Germany and fall into the hands of German scientists
and engineers.

So Churchill handed the cavity magnetron to Roosevelt as a free gift
in return for 50 rusty, old, WW1 destroyers. The manufacturing
capacity of the US radio industry far exceeded that of the UK. Not to
be outdone, the Americans soon produced a 10,000 MHz version.

I first held one in my hands in 1945 by which time centimetric radar
had been installed in RAF Catalina and Sunderland flying boats on
convoy-escort duties in the Battle of the Atlantic. By 1945 German
submarine crews were on suicide missions like kamikazi pilots, only 1
U-boat in 10 returned to base.

There are more than 100,000 merchant ship and U-boat crew-members
sharing Davy Jones locker at the silent bottom of the North Atlantic
Ocean. Thus was the ferocity of the war.

Once having detected a centimetric radar beam, and being accurately
located themselves, submarine commanders preferred to remain on the
surface, uncover the guns, and fight it out, day or night.

During most of the war there had been little effect on German
industrial production by RAF raids. Many bombs fell on open fields and
sometimes killed cattle. But by 1944 RAF navigatigators had maps of
rivers and cities laid before them. More than a 1000 heavy bombers,
Lancasters, could be put into the air, night after night.

With radar they couldn't miss whole cities and individual districts.
Nevertheless on one occasion more than 100 bombers, complete with
crews, failed to return to base. Such occurrences greatly exceeded the
capacity of factories to produce them and to train aircrews.

During the last 12 months of the war, radar equipped RAF bombers
killed more German civilians than died in the concentration camps.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which came shortly after, were just chicken
feed. Air Marshal "Bomber" Harris was never knighted for services
rendered.

The main beneficiaries of R & B's invention of the cavity magnetron,
done amid the high-explosives and incendiaries falling on Birmingam,
have been the Japanese and other Far Eastern peoples who have
manufactured many millions of cheap, reliable, microwave ovens.

And of course the many millions of people like you and I who benefit
from daily hot meals. I detest barbiques.

There was held in the Kensington, London, Science Museum, the original
prototype of the cavity magnetron without its magnet. It was in a
securely locked mahogany and glass case and looked, as I recollect,
like a small dirty can of baked beans with things sticking out of it.
It may still be there.

Makes a change from so-called SWR meters.
----
Reg, G4FGQ.



Richard Clark September 24th 05 07:46 AM

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:21:07 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

Makes a change from so-called SWR meters.


Ah Reggie!

Hardly, SWR was the second most considered technical hurdle in the
development of RADAR.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Reg Edwards September 24th 05 09:04 AM


Makes a change from so-called SWR meters.


Ah Reggie!

Hardly, SWR was the second most considered technical hurdle in the
development of RADAR.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


=================================

Ah Rich!, Yet again you deliberately distort my meaning in your
amusing game of 0ne-Upmanship.

For the benefit of lurkers, there's a great difference between meters
which purport to measure SWR at HF, but do no such thing and tell
lies, and probes inserted in waveguides at 3 GHz which tell the truth.
----
Reg.



David G. Nagel September 24th 05 06:09 PM

Reg Edwards wrote:
Copied from the UK Amateur Radio Newsgroup.

===================================
"Joe McElvenney" wrote

Randall and Boot's cavity magnetron
didn't really come onto the scene until about 1940.


===================================

R & B's cavity magnetron was developed at Birmingham University in the
midst of the air raids on that industrial city. We can imagine R & B
having to hide under the workbench whenever a descending bomb was
heard, culminating in a loud bang and broken glass.

The ingenious device generated a peak pulse power of 50 kilowatts at
3000 MHz. Pulse repetition frequency 400 Hz. Pulse width 1
microsecond. So far as I can remember there were 6 or 8 cavities
milled into the copper block. Alternate anodes surrounding the
cathode, and close to it, were strapped together at their ends via
copper bars. The block diameter was about 2" and about 1" thick. The
magnet was a U-shape with pole-pieces which closely fitted the flat
ends round the block such that the magnetic field was parallel to the
cathode.

Because the luftwaffer in 1940/1 had more bombers than the RAF, and in
view of its potential as a war weapon, Churchill personally banned
installation in RAF aircraft in case the top-secret device should be
shot down over Germany and fall into the hands of German scientists
and engineers.

So Churchill handed the cavity magnetron to Roosevelt as a free gift
in return for 50 rusty, old, WW1 destroyers. The manufacturing
capacity of the US radio industry far exceeded that of the UK. Not to
be outdone, the Americans soon produced a 10,000 MHz version.

I first held one in my hands in 1945 by which time centimetric radar
had been installed in RAF Catalina and Sunderland flying boats on
convoy-escort duties in the Battle of the Atlantic. By 1945 German
submarine crews were on suicide missions like kamikazi pilots, only 1
U-boat in 10 returned to base.

There are more than 100,000 merchant ship and U-boat crew-members
sharing Davy Jones locker at the silent bottom of the North Atlantic
Ocean. Thus was the ferocity of the war.

Once having detected a centimetric radar beam, and being accurately
located themselves, submarine commanders preferred to remain on the
surface, uncover the guns, and fight it out, day or night.

During most of the war there had been little effect on German
industrial production by RAF raids. Many bombs fell on open fields and
sometimes killed cattle. But by 1944 RAF navigatigators had maps of
rivers and cities laid before them. More than a 1000 heavy bombers,
Lancasters, could be put into the air, night after night.

With radar they couldn't miss whole cities and individual districts.
Nevertheless on one occasion more than 100 bombers, complete with
crews, failed to return to base. Such occurrences greatly exceeded the
capacity of factories to produce them and to train aircrews.

During the last 12 months of the war, radar equipped RAF bombers
killed more German civilians than died in the concentration camps.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which came shortly after, were just chicken
feed. Air Marshal "Bomber" Harris was never knighted for services
rendered.

The main beneficiaries of R & B's invention of the cavity magnetron,
done amid the high-explosives and incendiaries falling on Birmingam,
have been the Japanese and other Far Eastern peoples who have
manufactured many millions of cheap, reliable, microwave ovens.

And of course the many millions of people like you and I who benefit
from daily hot meals. I detest barbiques.

There was held in the Kensington, London, Science Museum, the original
prototype of the cavity magnetron without its magnet. It was in a
securely locked mahogany and glass case and looked, as I recollect,
like a small dirty can of baked beans with things sticking out of it.
It may still be there.

Makes a change from so-called SWR meters.
----
Reg, G4FGQ.


Reg;

Thank you for your report. And thank your country men for the many
inventions that they have contributed to mankind.

Dave, WD9BDZ

Richard Clark September 24th 05 06:09 PM

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:


Makes a change from so-called SWR meters.


Ah Reggie!

Hardly, SWR was the second most considered technical hurdle in the
development of RADAR.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


=================================

Ah Rich!, Yet again you deliberately distort my meaning in your
amusing game of 0ne-Upmanship.

For the benefit of lurkers, there's a great difference between meters
which purport to measure SWR at HF, but do no such thing and tell
lies, and probes inserted in waveguides at 3 GHz which tell the truth.


Ah Reggie,

Yet again, you deliberately distort my meaning in your amusing game of
One-Downmanship.

For the benefit of lurkers, there's absolutely no difference between
meters which purport to measure SWR at any frequency. You are simply
fumbling around with one of your conceits, a troll in the lingua
franca of the Internet.

What you now describe was a flicker in time between bombs and crashing
glass that was quickly discarded as an awkward technique when RADAR
went into production. Such troglodyte methods were long gone before
you even wrapped your mitts around a magnetron.

If we pursue this with your absurd reductionist habit of arguing blind
absolutes in place of practical reality (something Lord Kelvinator
would sneer at as a foppish mannerism); then what you describe as
"probes" are measuring nothing about SWR but are doing what any probe
could accomplish: measuring a common unit of voltage, or current (and
only by inference of the actual through rectification and filtering).
The SWR only arrives by a second (or significantly more than two)
reading, and then FURTHER only after various calculations. Even then,
barring calculations (something no one does except squinty-eyed
scientists and trolls), those same METERs employed were marked in SWR.
Imagine, within very few months of RADAR emerging from the lab, SWR
METERs ruled the production line, and the field kit. And to be sure,
did they measure SWR? As much as any instrument and to your
fulminating frustration, to no obvious difference that would be
observed by Maxwell's demon (or Schrodinger's cat) craftily turned to
this mischievously scientific validation.

SWR arrived in its full glory of attention with RADAR. They were born
simultaneously and absolutely no one gave a fig before on this topic.
Further, it taught a generation of engineers the importance of
matching production designs (which had been long inbred into the AC
power production community - simply a rediscovery of a "truth" that
had never been lost). This was probably because the consequence of
SWR is so dramatic in the 100s of KW, when it occurs in the locality
of the workbench in a system as small as the span of your arms. Even
the Old Wives notice it if they, in error, try to microwave a product
wrapped in a crumpled foil such as butter is wrapped. Their startled
reaction evokes an immediate response, just as my post caused your
knee to jerk reflexively beneath your apron.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Reg Edwards September 24th 05 07:07 PM

Rich, you sure have an extensive vocabulary.

But try as I can, I can't make any sense out of your long message
about what can only be a trivial matter of your chosen ideas of
gamesmanship.

Kaput! I give up.
----
Yours, Punchinello, G4FGQ.



[email protected] September 24th 05 07:30 PM

Reg Edwards wrote:

Makes a change from so-called SWR meters.


Ah Reggie!

Hardly, SWR was the second most considered technical hurdle in the
development of RADAR.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


=================================


Ah Rich!, Yet again you deliberately distort my meaning in your
amusing game of 0ne-Upmanship.


For the benefit of lurkers, there's a great difference between meters
which purport to measure SWR at HF, but do no such thing and tell
lies, and probes inserted in waveguides at 3 GHz which tell the truth.
----
Reg.


Sorry, I don't see any difference between making voltage measurements
with a directional coupler and calculating SWR through meter calibration
and making voltage measurements on a slotted line and calculating SWR
with a calculator or pencil and paper.

Best I can tell is you are saying there is no such thing as a SWR meter.

That's like saying there is no such thing as an airspeed meter in an
airplane; the meter really measures air impact pressure.

If that is your point, so what?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Richard Clark September 24th 05 07:44 PM

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:07:19 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

But try as I can, I can't make any sense out of your long message


Ah Reggie,

As Dr. Johnson would paraphrase himself "claims of illiteracy is the
last refuge of the troll." [Not to deny that you are in plenty of
company - but you would shrug off that association.]

This is notable in that you assert:
about what can only be a trivial matter

which, of course, means you understood enough not to be able to deny
Lord Kelvinator harrumphing at your feigned attitude. It is an ill
fitted cloak.

of your chosen ideas of gamesmanship.


This is the truly amusing part, you deliberately raised two topics
(nothing had to be said about SWR meters, certainly - that injection
is your trademark invitation), and you had two respondents answering
to each of them. Even the sewer rats of Rio could see that you
considered the more interesting topic as the one that you have now
three times pursued. Such are the games being played, bucko! ;-)

C'mon, if I hadn't responded you would have been sorely disappointed
and would have had to sneer at David as an american suck-up trying to
soothe an olde codger. You need a lightning rod to keep your current
flowing and your response is the thanks I get.

You're welcome, Old Son!

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Reg Edwards September 25th 05 04:44 AM

Jim,

To measure SWR on the line it is necessary to place the SWR meter at
the antenna end of the line. Even then it gives the correct answer
only when the line impedance is 50 ohms.

But the SWR meter is always placed immediately adjacent to the
transmitter. Whatever the meter indicates it is not SWR because there
is no line on which to measure it. The meter is telling lies.

The meter indicates only whether or not the transmitter is loaded with
a resistance of 50 ohms. Which is ALL you want to know. It tells you
nothing more and nothing less.

This is, of course, a very valuable function of the instrument. But
it is NOT behaving as an SWR meter. Its name should be changed to
Transmitter Loading Indicator (TLI).

To use the name "SWR meter" and to imagine it is actually measuring an
SWR is seriously misleading and is a source of confusion about what is
really going on.

It is why there are perpetual arguments and misunderstandings about
SWR, tuners and related matters on this newsgroup and in every other
place.

Change the name to TLI, which is what it really does. Novices will not
be lead astray, clear thinking will prevail, false ideas will not take
root to remain embedded for the remainder of one's radio career.

Air pressure indicators instead of airspeedometers are OK because air
pressure actually exists.

SWR meters are NOT OK because there is no line for SWR to exist on.
(At least not where the meter is imagined or supposed to measure it.)

Makes a change from cavity magnetrons.
----
Reg.



Walter Maxwell September 25th 05 04:02 PM

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 03:44:00 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

Ah, Reggie, and Richie----

You two ought to go on the road together--your humor beats Bob Hope's hands
down. You'd have em laughing their guts out in the aisles!

Walt, W2DU



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com