Only Cecil could dream up a use for such an effect.

Sorry Reg, I only dream of six foot tall blonds with big boobs.
The 2% WL value came from sci.physics.electromag.

========================================

Yes Cec, you've told us before. I read the thread. That newsgroup
has more highly-convincing old-wives than this one has. They are just
a little harder to detect.

2% of wavelength is meaningless unless you also state by how much
input impedance has diverged from Zo after a time T has elapsed.
Wavelength also implies a frequency but what THAT has to do with it is
anybody's guess. It merely adds to the confusion.
----
Reg, G4FGQ