| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
Which means, in the ideal meter, the voltage tap-off and current tap-off points must be identically located within the instrument. In my MFJ, the toroid and calibration cap are about 1/2" apart. The story that the length of line inside the meter is used to detect and measure standing wave ratios is just another old-wives' tale which confuses CB-ers, novices and professional engineers alike. And if you will remember, the original question didn't involve the SWR meter at all. The question was: Are my 2-foot sections of RG-400 connected to my SWR meter long enough to ensure that the SWR meter reading is valid for the coax? Remember that argument? The threads for the past few days have all diverged from that original question which was: How long must the 50 ohm coax connected to the SWR meter be for the SWR meter to report a valid SWR *on that coax*? The answer obviously cannot be zero length. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| V/I ratio is forced to Z0 | Antenna | |||
| S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Antenna | |||
| S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Equipment | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
| speaker impedance transformation | Homebrew | |||