| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:43:18 -0400, Walter Maxwell
wrote: We are discussing the Bruene version of the device in which the inductance derives a sample of the current and C1 derives a sample of the voltage. When C1 is adjusted to obtain the correct voltage for the voltage-current ratio to equal Zo at that point, such as 50 ohms, the device provides the correct readings when the line impedance on the load side is Zo. The line impedance Zo on the input side is irrelevant. Hi Walt, You might force what appears to be SWR meter action, but what you describe above is not sufficient to offer the original accuracy; and at that point why bother putting a screwdriver in and twisting things? To accomplish the purpose being discussed takes TWO changes (of the THREE variables of design) as I have already discussed. Except under the most fortuitous of circumstances, there is nothing inside the meter that even closely approaches Z0 - or has to. As an aside to your comments and directed to the novitiates, any number of Bruene variants can be found where those variants offer less than optimal performance. However, quality equipment offers that the line transiting between input and output connectors and thru the sensing core IS Z0. This consideration takes so little effort, that those designs that do not are probably suffering other short-cuts away from intelligence. This opprobrium goes equally for arguments that presume there is no line either. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| V/I ratio is forced to Z0 | Antenna | |||
| S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Antenna | |||
| S/N ratio question - have I got this right? | Equipment | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
| speaker impedance transformation | Homebrew | |||