|
Antenna problem
Hi!
If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Bob |
Antenna problem
"oldcrow" wrote in message oups.com... Hi! If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Newbie here. Doesn't higher frequency = shorter wavelength? Therefore, shorter elements? Also, probably need to adjust spacing of elements per the formula. HankG |
Antenna problem
Hello,
Be careful! Thin Ice! try it with: wavelength_in_meter = 300 / frequency_in_MHz or go to your local phone shop and by a WLAN antenna. 73 de F8BOE Olivier ...-.- oldcrow trolled: Hi! If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Bob |
Antenna problem
oldcrow wrote:
If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Cut all 1.2 gHz dimensions in half for 2.4 gHz. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Antenna problem
No.
If you begin with a Yagi antenna made for exactly 1.2 GHz and *reduce* the element length, element diameter, and element spacing all by a factor of two, it would work at exactly 2.4 GHz. That's assuming that the effect of the boom is negligible. If the boom is large enough to have an effect (typically the case), you'll also have to reduce the diameter of the boom by a factor of two. There's an infinite number of other combinations which will work; for example, you can leave the element and boom diameters the same and change only the spacing and element length. But then the spacing and element length will need to be changed by some factor other than two, and there's no simple way to calculate the factor. Roy Lewallen, W7EL oldcrow wrote: Hi! If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Bob |
Antenna problem
No!
A Yagi is a moderately complex design. Generally a computer, or computer generated graphics and length tables are used for element length, spacing and boom length. A 2.4 GHz Yagi would be close to 1/2 size, in all dimensions, of a 1.2 GHz antenna. Your best bet is to buy a commercial antenna for your application. AK oldcrow wrote: Hi! If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Bob |
Antenna problem
Remember that the relationship between wavelength and Frequency is
defined by the equation --- c = Lambda X Nu where c = 300,000,000 meters per second Lambda = wavelength (in meters) Nu = Frequency in cycles per second Thus solving for either lambda or nu reveals an inversely proportional relationship between the two. Consequently as the number of cycles per second (frequency) increases, the wavelength shortens. Rus |
Antenna problem
No. It would work at 600 MHz.. You went the wrong way.
If you cut ALL dimensions in half it would work at 2.4 GHz.. However, ALL dimensions include element diameters, boom diameters, element lengths and spacing. Jim "oldcrow" wrote in message oups.com... Hi! If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Bob |
Antenna problem
oldcrow wrote: Hi! If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Bob Hi Guys: Thanks for the information. I went the wrong way. I meant I have a 2.4 gHz antenna and want to revamp it for 1.2 gHz operation. Frequency increases element length decreases. Many thanks for the input. Bob K2HML |
Antenna problem
It might work better if you HALVE the size. As freq. goes up, size of
elements goes down. Scott N0EDV oldcrow wrote: Hi! If I was to take yagi antenna for 1.2 gHz and then double the length of each element. Would that work on 2.4 gHz? Bob |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com