![]() |
antenna lengths
There are some commonly occurring lengths for multi-band dipoles. I see
105', 135', and 140'. Is 140' preferred over 135'? If so, what is the benefit of going from 135' to 140'? Just curious. |
antenna lengths
RB wrote:
There are some commonly occurring lengths for multi-band dipoles. I see 105', 135', and 140'. Is 140' preferred over 135'? If so, what is the benefit of going from 135' to 140'? Just curious. That's about a 3.5% difference. You get just about that much difference between insulated and uninsulated wire. That much difference in length doesn't much matter for non-resonant length dipoles. However, for resonant dipoles, length certainly matters and 140 ft. would probably be resonant outside of the 80m band. For instance, a resonant 1/2WL dipole for 3.8 MHz would be about 123 foot long. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
antenna lengths
Hi RB, With multi-band dipoles you will have to use an antenna tuner.
The lengths you see in the charts are chosen such that the antenna+feedline will have an impedance (hopefully) on multiple bands that your antenna tuner can handle. Usually if a 135' dipole won't load on a certain band, the feedline length is changed, because it is easier than bringing down the dipole and changing to 140'. Gary N4AST |
antenna lengths
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:40:09 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
That's about a 3.5% difference. You get just about that much difference between insulated and uninsulated wire. That much difference in length Cecil, do you have theoretical or experimental support for the inference that insulated vs uninsulated wire will be different in length by around 3.5%? What thickness wire / insulation? Owen -- |
antenna lengths
do you have theoretical or experimental support for the
inference that insulated vs uninsulated wire will be different in length by around 3.5%? What thickness wire / insulation? Owen ========================================= To calculate change in velocity due to plastic PVC insulation we need to know :- Wire diameter = d Diameter over insulation = D Height of wire above ground = H Permittivity of insulating material = K First calculate capacitance of bare wire to ground. Then calculate capacitance of insulated wire to ground. Velocity Factor = SquareRoot of their ratio. Neither Terman's nor Kraus' Bibles will mention the following formulae. So you'll just have to take my word for it. Velocity Factor = SquareRoot( ( A + B ) / C ) Where - A = K * Ln( 4 * H / D ) B = Ln( D / d ) C = K * Ln( 4 * H / d ) Example : Bare wire diameter = 1.6 mm = 14 awg. Diameter over insulation = 2.6 mm. Height above ground = 10 metres = 33 feet. Permittivity of insulation = 3.5 Velocity factor = 0.983 Or a decrease in resonant frequency of 1.7 percent which can nearly always be forgotten about. The electrical effect of the enamel on magnet wire is entirely negligible. But it does protect the wire from atmospheric pollution. ---- Reg. |
antenna lengths
"RB" wrote in message
... There are some commonly occurring lengths for multi-band dipoles. I see 105', 135', and 140'. Is 140' preferred over 135'? If so, what is the benefit of going from 135' to 140'? Just curious. Read the following: http://members.dslextreme.com/users/w6wqc/antenna.html The data on antenna efficiency is a misinterpretation of the NEC output file. It refers only to copper losses, and does not include ground losses. The discussion that "The length of an antenna wire is irrelevant" is the key point made. 73, Frank |
antenna lengths
There are some commonly occurring lengths for multi-band dipoles. I see
105', 135', and 140'. Is 140' preferred over 135'? If so, what is the benefit of going from 135' to 140'? Just curious. Pse look at the web: http://www.qsl.net/aa1ll/cfwire.htm Depending on your location (length of the feeder and free space for the dipole) consider Region 1, 3 or G5RV Region. 73 Chris SP7ICE |
antenna lengths
There are some commonly occurring lengths for multi-band dipoles. I see
105', 135', and 140'. Is 140' preferred over 135'? If so, what is the benefit of going from 135' to 140'? Just curious. Pse look at the web: http://www.qsl.net/aa1ll/cfwire.htm Depending on your location (length of the feeder and free space for the dipole) consider Region 1, 3 or G5RV Region. 73 Chris SP7ICE |
antenna lengths
Owen Duffy wrote:
Cecil, do you have theoretical or experimental support for the inference that insulated vs uninsulated wire will be different in length by around 3.5%? What thickness wire / insulation? Owen, that info came from Roy, W7EL, who built it into the latest version of EZNEC. It has to do with the VF of insulated wire Vs uninsulated wire which affects wire antennas as well as transmission lines. I discovered it for myself when I was building vertical loop antennas many years ago. The equation 1005/f wasn't even close using insulated wire. For instance, my 130 foot bare copper wire dipole is resonant at 3.633 MHz according to EZNEC. Adding 0.05 inch of PE insulation drops the resonant frequency to 3.526 MHz, about a 3% drop according to EZNEC. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
antenna lengths
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:15:11 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: do you have theoretical or experimental support for the inference that insulated vs uninsulated wire will be different in length by around 3.5%? What thickness wire / insulation? Owen ========================================= To calculate change in velocity due to plastic PVC insulation we need to know :- Wire diameter = d Diameter over insulation = D Height of wire above ground = H Permittivity of insulating material = K First calculate capacitance of bare wire to ground. Then calculate capacitance of insulated wire to ground. Velocity Factor = SquareRoot of their ratio. Neither Terman's nor Kraus' Bibles will mention the following formulae. So you'll just have to take my word for it. Velocity Factor = SquareRoot( ( A + B ) / C ) Where - A = K * Ln( 4 * H / D ) B = Ln( D / d ) C = K * Ln( 4 * H / d ) Example : Bare wire diameter = 1.6 mm = 14 awg. Diameter over insulation = 2.6 mm. Height above ground = 10 metres = 33 feet. Permittivity of insulation = 3.5 Velocity factor = 0.983 Or a decrease in resonant frequency of 1.7 percent which can nearly always be forgotten about. The electrical effect of the enamel on magnet wire is entirely negligible. But it does protect the wire from atmospheric pollution. Thanks Reg. I had not doubt there was an effect, but it was the arbitrary percentage figure that was implied irrespective of physical parameters which could have a large range (such as your examples). Clearly, the effect is a minor one in practical HF wire antenna cases compared to the influence of nearby structures, ground conditions etc, and one that is adequately dealt with by normal expectations of trimming length of an antenna for resonance (where that is the objective) rather than "designing" for the insulation factor. Owen -- |
antenna lengths
"Reg Edwards" wrote To calculate change in velocity due to plastic PVC insulation we need to know :- Wire diameter = d Diameter over insulation = D Height of wire above ground = H Permittivity of insulating material = K First calculate capacitance of bare wire to ground. Then calculate capacitance of insulated wire to ground. Velocity Factor = SquareRoot of their ratio. Neither Terman's nor Kraus' Bibles will mention the following formulae. So you'll just have to take my word for it. Velocity Factor = SquareRoot( ( A + B ) / C ) Where - A = K * Ln( 4 * H / D ) B = Ln( D / d ) C = K * Ln( 4 * H / d ) Example : Bare wire diameter = 1.6 mm = 14 awg. Diameter over insulation = 2.6 mm. Height above ground = 10 metres = 33 feet. Permittivity of insulation = 3.5 Velocity factor = 0.983 Or a decrease in resonant frequency of 1.7 percent which can nearly always be forgotten about. The electrical effect of the enamel on magnet wire is entirely negligible. But it does protect the wire from atmospheric pollution. ======================================== After a couple of days, and the time it took to derive the equations, does nobody want to argue about it ? What about you, my dear Richard Clark ? By the way, I have now reverted to Australian, Banrock Station red plonk as being the best buy in my local supermarket. To get into my glass it has to come 12,000 miles. But, like it or not, our small globe gets smaller day by day. ---- Reg, G4FGQ. |
antenna lengths
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:31:04 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: does nobody want to argue about it ? What about you, my dear Richard Clark ? By the way, I have now reverted to Australian, Banrock Station red I've been drinking "Tango" labels from Argentina. Wanna step out into the parking lot to talk about this? |
antenna lengths
On 2005-10-29, Reg Edwards wrote:
By the way, I have now reverted to Australian, Banrock Station red Yellow Tail Shiraz |
antenna lengths
"Richard Clark" wrote - Wanna step out into the parking lot to talk about this? =================================== A typical USA aggresive attitude towards foreigners. ;o) |
antenna lengths
What da ya mean by that, you want me to kick your limey ass...
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... =================================== A typical USA aggresive attitude towards foreigners. ;o) |
antenna lengths
Reg Edwards wrote:
"Richard Clark" wrote - Wanna step out into the parking lot to talk about this? A typical USA aggresive attitude towards foreigners. ;o) That's also a pick up line, Reg. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
antenna lengths
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:50:17 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
Reg Edwards wrote: "Richard Clark" wrote - Wanna step out into the parking lot to talk about this? A typical USA aggresive attitude towards foreigners. ;o) That's also a pick up line, Reg. :-) Cecil, I don't know whether these guys want to step into the parking lot to trade kicks to the groin, or to smooch... but neither is too edifying! Owen -- |
antenna lengths
Reg Edwards wrote:
A typical USA aggresive attitude towards foreigners. ;o) I hope none of the readers of this newsgroup are tempted to consider Reg's attitude or abrasiveness as typical of his countrymen. I recently returned from three weeks in Great Britain, ranging from southern England to the Isle of Skye in Scotland, and to southern and central Wales. Like on my previous three trips there, I was treated very well by some of the nicest people I know and have met. I, my wife, and son were taken in as house guests by two very good friends in different parts of the country. I'm sure that if I'd displayed the sort of attitude toward the British that Reg constantly does toward Americans, I would have had an entirely different experience. But I'd rather concentrate on what good people have in common. And there are a lot of good people in all countries. As well as a few grumps, of course. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
antenna lengths
Roy, I have to second your opinion. The last time the wife and I were in
Europe, we were standing in the airport in Frankfurt heading to Italy, we both at the same time said "Let's go back to England". We like to stay at the Bull in Gerrard's Cross and find the people are wonderful. I was readily accepted into the Denham flying club and enjoyed touring England via private plane. The huge chalk carvings south of London can only be appreciated from the air. I picture Reg as an old socialist that time has passed by, and he has since decided to become a professional curmudgeon. He does provide humor from time to time. We must always remember - Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it is only as a bad example -. I think of him every time I see the brother-in-law on "Keeping Up Appearances" on the BBC. "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Reg Edwards wrote: A typical USA aggresive attitude towards foreigners. ;o) I hope none of the readers of this newsgroup are tempted to consider Reg's attitude or abrasiveness as typical of his countrymen. I recently returned from three weeks in Great Britain, ranging from southern England to the Isle of Skye in Scotland, and to southern and central Wales. Like on my previous three trips there, I was treated very well by some of the nicest people I know and have met. I, my wife, and son were taken in as house guests by two very good friends in different parts of the country. I'm sure that if I'd displayed the sort of attitude toward the British that Reg constantly does toward Americans, I would have had an entirely different experience. But I'd rather concentrate on what good people have in common. And there are a lot of good people in all countries. As well as a few grumps, of course. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
antenna lengths
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:53:45 -0500, "Fred W4JLE"
wrote: I think of him every time I see the brother-in-law on "Keeping Up Appearances" on the BBC. Don't you feel that's a bit complimentary whats-his-name and a bit derogatory to the brother-in-law. Danny, K6MHE email: k6mheatarrldotnet http://www.k6mhe.com/ |
antenna lengths
Dan Richardson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:53:45 -0500, "Fred W4JLE" wrote: I think of him every time I see the brother-in-law on "Keeping Up Appearances" on the BBC. Don't you feel that's a bit complimentary whats-his-name and a bit derogatory to the brother-in-law. Danny, K6MHE Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain) is one of the characters in one of Harry Turtledove's excellent "alternate history" books. In the story, Clemens is living in San Francisco and has a dog named after the mayor, whom he detests. After a particularly frustrating meeting with the mayor, Clemens returns home and apologizes to the dog -- "When I named you," he says, "I thought I was insulting the mayor. But it turns out that I was insulting you." Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com