Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just an extra comment Chris.
The "non reflective path" is also real important. As a circular polarised signal reflects off objects, it changes polarisation to the opposite sense. You'll find that "opposite polarised" in circular has far more (in practice) attenuation than for plane antenna cross polarisation. If your path has an odd number of reflections you have to use the opposite polarisation at each end. Cheers Bob VK2YQA Chris W wrote: I am reading the 19th edition of the ARRL Antenna Book. I am unclear which polarization to use if I want 2 Helical antennas to talk to each other. In the book it says, ". . . when two stations use helical antennas over a non reflective path, both must use antennas with the same polarization sense.." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave |