Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Miguel Chezzi, LU6ETJ wrote:
"In a deep focal point of parabolic dish two antennas are mounted... Which of them does pick up more energy? An antenna with 180 degree beamwidth or a highly directional sntenna with 0.1 degree beamwidth (both pointed to dish, of course)?" I`ll risk being the fool. We sometimes test for illumination of a reflector. We would not be concerned were it not advantageous to do so. With 180-degree radiation, we fill the dish, using all its surface. With 0.1-degree illumination, we might as well remove all but the illuminated area. It would save dead load and wind loading. My answer: The 180-degree radiation angle will receive a larger area of the plane-wavefront and extract more watts from the wave with a given number of watts per square area. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Handheld GMRS/FRS radio antenna gain question | Antenna | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |