Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Clark wrote: Anyway, I would surmise that if I could achieve both random phase and frequency distribution, then the difference between a simple dipole's response and that of a yagi antenna would be trivial. Trivial would be a nice change. This would be a given seeing that the parasitic elements would be virtually invisible, rendering the "driven" element un-differentiable from the simple dipole. i.e. what Roy said. But I think there's still more to it. I tried to give the other Richard a hint about it but it didn't resonate. 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Handheld GMRS/FRS radio antenna gain question | Antenna | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |