Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:13:34 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote: It is fixed by creating a uniform field. As I said before, integrating the results from a large number of individual point sources (rather than superposing the fields from a large array of point sources) would not produce an interference pattern. Hi Jim, Here you are clearly wrong in some presumption. For one, I have done exactly as you have demanded should be done and you find an error. I have responded several times to this identical complaint you've offered, and you have neither offered what that error is, or where I differ from what you insist in integrating the results. It seems to me in performing it exactly as you describe it, that I have very little choice in that matter anyway and barring further elaboration in how my fulfilling your imperative differs from your imperative, your point remains rather elusive. hence an interference pattern is immaterial to the loss of power as both designs suffer the same pattern - and equally I might point out, if other arguments are consistently applied that equal powers should be exhibited. This is apparently incorrect, as both antennas should produce the same result. "Should" is the operative word here. "Doesn't" is clearly exhibited. You don't explain the "Should" and you clearly have issue with the "Doesn't," but to this point you and others haven't got much to offer. As I put the challenge to Roy, offer your own model that fulfills the "Should." Results haven't exactly flown out of that yet, if ever. One wouldn't have to do as much handwaving and fast talking if the field was uniform, Richard. A circular uniform field? And one that exists without a pattern of interference within it? That could only exist at the beginning of creation reverse filling the void of the cosmos. THIS is hand waving. ;-) However, let's just cut to the chase in that you are clearly disturbed by this "interference pattern" that the tool so clearly reveals. What about it is so inimical to your expectations? The partitioning of the problem into multiple sources dates back to Huygens' principle. Predating EZNEC by 300+ years suggests that the math has more or less stabilized such that the model confirms it. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Handheld GMRS/FRS radio antenna gain question | Antenna | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |