Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 05, 07:30 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default 900MHz antenna at sea surface

Dave wrote:

a solid ground plane would be more efficient, but is of course bigger,
heavier, and more wind load if you are worried about it blowing around. the
3-4 radials bent down gives an easy way to fine tune the impedance... of
course if they aren't stiff enough they can get bent if slapped around in
waves.


Why would a solid ground plane be more efficient? What's the loss
mechanism in radials?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
On Topic [email protected] Shortwave 5 November 2nd 05 10:35 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod Soliloquy Scanner 11 October 11th 03 01:36 AM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017