| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: But do you agree that it's not impossible for an E field to exist without an H field? Depends upon the context. I suspect he was talking within the context of RF EM waves? That's certainly a context where an E field is always accompanied by an H field. But the statement as it was written is nevertheless untrue. That was my only point. Is it possible for an RF E-field to exist without an RF H-field? Seems to beg an obvious answer. But the question brings up a point that people seem to be missing here. An E field is an E field - there are not different 'kinds' of E fields. The field itself is the same, whether it varies in time or not. A non-zero dE/dt allows for some of the more interesting properties to have non-zero solutions, but the fields themselves are not unique. I hope that concept isn't too controversial for this group. If it is, I will strive to keep such ideas to myself in the future. ac6xg |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
| Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave | |||