LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 5th 05, 07:18 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default Antenna reception theory



Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

You mean like Ptotal = P1 + P2 + 2*SQRT(P1*P2)cos(a) ? :-)
The first time I saw that equation was in Dr. Best's QEX article.



Yes, and you didn't believe it when you saw it.


Wave P1 contains 75 watts and Wave P2 contains 8.33 watts.
Without a source of constructive interference energy, they cannot
add up to 133.33 watts.


And obviously he still doesn't believe it, Gene.

73, ac6xg

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
significance of feedline orientation Brian Shortwave 6 October 22nd 04 02:43 AM
Question for better antenna mavens than I Tony Meloche Shortwave 7 October 28th 03 10:16 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 08:44 PM
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception Soliloquy Shortwave 2 September 29th 03 05:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017