Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
"100% wave cancellation means 100% energy reflection." That's a no-brainer when quoted in the context of an RF transmission line. Shame on you for once again quoting something out of context. If it happened in space, it would say, "100% wave cancellation means 100% energy redistribution." as explained on the web pages below. There are only two directions in a transmission line. If energy rejected by a mismatched load doesn't make it to the source, in a lossless system, it must necessarily be 100% re-reflected. Rho^2 is reflected by the impedance discontinuity at the match point. That's step one. Step two is that 100% wave cancellation. Given those two steps, no reflected energy flows toward the source. Therefore, it must necessarily have been re-reflected back toward the load. Since it joins the forward energy wave, we can measure that is exactly what happens. It's a no-brainer. Here's the in-context quote. The destructive interference energy resulting from wave cancellation at an impedance discontinuity becomes an equal magnitude of constructive interference in the opposite direction. Since there are only two directions in a transmission line, wave cancellation is the equivalent of an energy reflection. 100% wave cancellation means 100% energy reflection. [9] [9] Quotes from two web pages from the field of optical engineering: www.mellesgriot.com/products/optics/oc_2_1.htm "Clearly, if the wavelength of the incident light and the thickness of the film are such that a phase difference exists between reflections of p, then reflected wavefronts interfere destructively, and overall reflected intensity is a minimum. If the two reflections are of equal amplitude, then this amplitude (and hence intensity) minimum will be zero." "In the absence of absorption or scatter, the principle of conservation of energy indicates all ‘lost’ reflected intensity will appear as enhanced intensity in the transmitted beam. The sum of the reflected and transmitted beam intensities is always equal to the incident intensity. This important fact has been confirmed experimentally." http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/j...ons/index.html "... when two waves of equal amplitude and wavelength that are 180-degrees ... out of phase with each other meet, they are not actually annihilated, ... All of the photon energy present in these waves must somehow be recovered or redistributed in a new direction, according to the law of energy conservation ... Instead, upon meeting, the photons are redistributed to regions that permit constructive interference, so the effect should be considered as a redistribution of light waves and photon energy rather than the spontaneous construction or destruction of light." Note from W5DXP: In an RF transmission line, since there are only two possible directions, the only "regions that permit constructive interference" at an impedance discontinuity is the opposite direction from the direction of destructive interference. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |