Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:37:04 -0700, Wes Stewart
wrote: Maybe I misunderstand, but what you seem to be saying is that if I put Probe A at point X on a transmission line and Probe B at point X+Y (Y0), the phase difference with respect to frequency will not change. The directional coupler is no different, it is sampling the main line at two physically different locations. With respect, I think you two guys are talking about different kinds of couplers. Wes, your earlier description makes is clear that samples in the coupler you described are located at equidistant from their nearest ends, but not in the centre, so at different positions in the coupler. I think the coupled lines type of coupler for lower frequency use might fit this category. Frank assumes a coupler where the samples for both ports are taken at the same physical location on the main line. I think a crossed waveguide coupler might fit this category (depending on the way the coupling holes are implemented). Owen -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
On Topic | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |