Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If Davis 9914 has the center conductor suspended by a thin spiral
thing like 9913, Davis BuryFlex 9914 does not have the center conductor suspended by a thin spiral. 1. http://www.davisrf.com/ham1/coax.htm#buryflex It amazes me that no one else (that I can find) has found Davis BuryFlex to be "bad coax". It has been in production well over 10 years. Moreover I am amazed how many of you are non-thinking lambs following along head-to-tail after your shepherd. And also Davis emphasizes in it's data that this coax is flexible enough for rotator loops and yet one guy says it is "bad coax" and so everyone falls to their knees and worships accordingly? And as far as data goes...is this guys data more accurate then the Davis RF company that has been in the wire and cable business with engineering professionals on the payroll since 1980? Sheesh......take off the blinders people.....thousands of miles of Davis 9914 have been installed by government,commercial and amateur stations and just now we find out it's "bad coax" after more than 10 years? Somebody is asleep at the switch....... -- Charlie "Mike" wrote in message . net... I had a bad experience with Belden 9913 and if Davis 9914 has the same mechanical properties, be careful. I taped some 9913 to a mast and sometime later discovered it had been squished flat from the tight wrap of electrical tape. I have also seen people ty-rap 9913 and destroy its shape. If Davis 9914 has the center conductor suspended by a thin spiral thing like 9913, I would not be surprised with varying performance when bending it. Here is some coax that looks like better performance than 9913 or Davis 9914 (2.7dB/450MHz/100ft) has the same Polyethylene outer jacket as Davis and is cheaper. Check http://yanta.pair.com/jefatech/specs...LL400Specs.pdf Mike Charlie wrote: I would recommend you take a look at Davis RF "BuryFlex" 9914. It is very nearly the exact same loss per 100ft (within a couple tenths of a db) as LMR400 and/or 9913. It can be directly buried in the soil with no other provisions needed. It has an abrasion resistant non-contaminating jacket that has a warranted 20 year service life. It is also quite affordable at about $.60/ft. It is very flexible and indeed is fine even as rotator loops. I use it on all bands I run from HF thru 6M and 2M. It uses standard UHF or N connectors as well. Loss per 100ft at 400MHZ is 2.9db Check it out here.... 1. http://www.davisrf.com/ham1/coax.htm#buryflex |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Coax experiment | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |