Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote: In my case when modeling my particular dipole I can make tremendous strides in efficiency if I attach wires at the end of the dipole that hang to the ground But when comparing gain say at 15 degrees horizontal there is no worthwhile increase in gain ie less than 10% of the difference ! Art, a *gain* in efficiency is as good as an increase in gain. :-) Cecil I believe you are missing the point.Either that or you have a motive for such an answer. An increase in efficiency will provide an equivalent gain at its 'max directivity point' but the gain at a low angle has increased by a very small amount. With my dipole antenna say at 40 % efficiency would be equivalent to a beverage antenna at 15 degrees. If I upped the efficiency of my antenna say to 80% then yes, you would see the gain at 90 degrees increase in a worth while manner but when you examine an overlay with the beverage at 15 degrees you would be hard put to see any difference. Draw the radiation patterns with both circles meeting at the ground level and you will see what I am getting at.( I am looking at horisontal polarisation now that provides different ground losses for polarisation antenna forms , the beverage being very close to ground) Art |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |