Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly
The ground influence on verticals is horible so getting away from it or going horizontal are good viable choices depending on the TOA required for your own particular purposes Art Richard Clark wrote in message . .. On 4 Dec 2003 08:42:58 -0800, (Art Unwin KB9MZ) wrote: I asked for experiences from those using two loaded verticals made into a dipole for horizontal polarisation on 160M. Regards Art Hi Art, Miserable. A simple balloon lifted halfwave vertical was declared the big guns by a net (surpassing their own antennas). Richard was right, more signal would find its way out if you simply drove the coax shield running up to the "dipole." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas | Antenna |