LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 5th 03, 02:08 PM
Art Unwin KB9MZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Exactly
The ground influence on verticals is horible so getting
away from it or going horizontal are good viable choices
depending on the TOA required for your own particular purposes
Art


Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On 4 Dec 2003 08:42:58 -0800, (Art Unwin KB9MZ)
wrote:

I asked for experiences from those using two loaded
verticals made into a dipole for horizontal polarisation on 160M.
Regards
Art


Hi Art,

Miserable. A simple balloon lifted halfwave vertical was declared the
big guns by a net (surpassing their own antennas).

Richard was right, more signal would find its way out if you simply
drove the coax shield running up to the "dipole."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM
efficiency of horizontal vs vertical antennas Ron Antenna 5 July 23rd 03 03:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017